Navigating the Nexus: Hydrogen, Advanced Nuclear, and Grid Modernization for U.S. Clean Energy Strategies in 2025

1. Executive Summary

The United States stands at a critical juncture in its pursuit of a clean energy future, with 2025 emerging as a pivotal year for assessing progress and adapting strategies. The confluence of rapidly advancing clean hydrogen technologies, the promise of advanced nuclear reactors, particularly Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), and the imperative of comprehensive grid modernization presents a transformative, albeit complex, pathway to achieve significant decarbonization and enhance energy security. This report analyzes the status, opportunities, challenges, and critical synergies among these three pillars within the U.S. context for 2025.

Hydrogen is positioned as a versatile energy carrier, supported by national strategies and substantial federal investment, aiming to drive down costs and scale production for hard-to-abate sectors. Advanced nuclear reactors, especially SMRs, offer the potential for firm, carbon-free power and heat, with several projects advancing through regulatory and development milestones in 2025, backed by significant Department of Energy (DOE) funding. Concurrently, grid modernization efforts are accelerating across states, focusing on smart technologies, energy storage, and transmission enhancements to accommodate new clean energy resources and growing electricity demand.

However, the path forward is characterized by substantial policy uncertainties, notably stemming from Executive Orders issued in early 2025 that signal a potential shift in federal energy priorities and challenge established clean energy initiatives and state-level climate actions. These developments overlay existing economic hurdles, such as the high upfront costs of first-of-a-kind SMRs and the scaling challenges for green hydrogen, alongside technological and logistical barriers including supply chain constraints, workforce development, cybersecurity threats, and lengthy permitting and interconnection queues.

The synergies between these technologies are profound. Nuclear power can provide the reliable, carbon-free electricity and heat necessary for cost-effective green hydrogen production. Hydrogen, in turn, can offer grid stability services and long-duration storage, complementing variable renewables and enhancing the economic case for nuclear assets. A modernized, intelligent grid is the indispensable backbone required to orchestrate these complex interactions, optimize energy flows, and ensure reliability.

Successfully harnessing this integrated potential in 2025 and beyond will demand robust public-private collaboration, strategic investments in "no-regrets" infrastructure, and the development of resilient policies that can navigate a dynamic political and economic landscape. This report offers an in-depth analysis of these interconnected elements and concludes with strategic recommendations for policymakers and industry stakeholders to advance a resilient and clean U.S. energy future.

2. Introduction: The 2025 Clean Energy Imperative for the US

Setting the Context: US Energy Transition Goals and the Critical Juncture in 2025

The United States is navigating a pivotal phase in its energy transition, driven by ambitious national goals to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The year 2025 serves as a crucial checkpoint for evaluating the efficacy of current strategies, the pace of technological deployment, and the adaptability of the energy system to meet escalating demands and evolving policy landscapes. A significant driver compelling this transition is the projected surge in electricity demand. Factors including the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) data centers, broader industrial and commercial electrification, and the increasing adoption of electric vehicles are collectively forecast to elevate U.S. electricity consumption substantially. Data from S&P Global Commodity Insights, released in March 2025, projects an unprecedented 35-50% increase in U.S. electricity demand between 2024 and 2040. This anticipated growth underscores the urgent necessity for an accelerated deployment of diverse, reliable, and clean energy resources to prevent a widening gap between supply and demand, which could otherwise lead to increased reliance on fossil fuels, thereby undermining long-term decarbonization objectives.

The Pivotal Roles of Hydrogen, Advanced Nuclear Reactors, and Grid Modernization

In this context, three technological and infrastructural pillars—clean hydrogen, advanced nuclear reactors (with a focus on Small Modular Reactors or SMRs), and comprehensive grid modernization—are increasingly recognized not merely as individual solutions but as interconnected components of a resilient, secure, and decarbonized energy system. Clean hydrogen offers a versatile, low-carbon energy carrier with the potential to decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors such as heavy industry and transportation, and to provide valuable energy storage and grid balancing services. Advanced nuclear reactors, particularly SMRs, promise firm, dispatchable, carbon-free electricity and process heat, offering a compact and scalable alternative or complement to traditional large-scale nuclear plants. Grid modernization, encompassing smart technologies, enhanced transmission capabilities, and energy storage integration, represents the enabling infrastructure essential for seamlessly incorporating these new resources, managing dynamic load profiles, and ensuring the overall reliability and efficiency of the electricity system.

Overview of the Prevailing Policy Landscape: Foundational Legislation and 2025 Executive Actions

The policy landscape influencing these developments in 2025 is multifaceted. Foundational legislation, notably the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), has established a strong framework of investments and incentives designed to catalyze the growth of clean energy technologies. These laws have allocated substantial funding for initiatives such as regional clean hydrogen hubs, SMR demonstration projects, and extensive grid upgrades. The energy-related subsidies within the IRA alone are estimated to represent a fiscal commitment ranging from $936 billion to $1.97 trillion over a ten-year period, underscoring the scale of federal support.

However, this supportive legislative framework is now intersected by significant policy shifts introduced in early 2025. The "Unleashing American Energy" Executive Order issued in January 2025 and the "Protecting American Energy From State Overreach" Executive Order issued in April 2025 signal a reorientation of federal energy priorities. These executive actions emphasize the accelerated development of domestic fossil fuel resources, mandate reviews and potential rescissions of existing environmental and clean energy regulations, and explicitly target state-level climate initiatives. This creates a complex, and at times contradictory, policy environment that clean energy stakeholders must navigate in 2025.

The surging electricity demand, as highlighted by S&P Global and corroborated by observations on AI and data center growth , creates an undeniable urgency for the rapid deployment of all available clean energy options. Yet, the policy uncertainty introduced by the 2025 Executive Orders threatens to decelerate investment and project development precisely when acceleration is paramount. Capital-intensive and long-lead-time projects, such as SMRs and large-scale hydrogen production facilities, are particularly sensitive to policy stability. The directives within these executive orders to review and potentially roll back clean energy regulations and funding mechanisms create an unstable foundation for such investments. This conflict could lead to a widening chasm between energy demand and the availability of clean supply, potentially compelling an increased reliance on conventional fossil fuels in the short to medium term, thereby jeopardizing national decarbonization targets and impacting long-term energy security and affordability.

Furthermore, the April 2025 Executive Order targeting state energy regulations signifies a potentially redefined federal-state dynamic in energy policy. By directly challenging the autonomy of states in pursuing their climate and clean energy agendas, this order may precipitate legal battles and foster a fragmented national approach. This stands in contrast to previous federal efforts that emphasized partnership with states to achieve clean energy deployment goals. States such as New York and California have already indicated their intent to resist these federal measures. A confrontational relationship between federal and state authorities could result in inconsistent regulatory landscapes across the nation, hindering the development of cohesive national markets and infrastructure for emerging technologies like hydrogen and advanced electricity transmission. If state-level clean energy initiatives are actively impeded or disincentivized, the attainment of overarching national climate and energy objectives will become considerably more challenging, potentially diminishing the efficacy of programs funded by the BIL and IRA that depend on robust state-level implementation.

3. Hydrogen: Fueling a Clean Energy Future

US National Hydrogen Strategy and DOE Program Status for 2025 (Targets, Funding)

The U.S. has embarked on a strategic initiative to establish a significant clean hydrogen economy, outlined in the U.S. National Clean Hydrogen Strategy and Roadmap. This comprehensive framework details pathways for large-scale hydrogen production and utilization, projecting scenarios for 2030, 2040, and 2050. While the roadmap does not enumerate specific production targets for 2025, it establishes critical metrics, market-driven actions, and a commitment to triennial updates to guide progress. A key objective within this strategy is the production of 10 million metric tons (MMT) of new "clean hydrogen" annually by 2030.

The Department of Energy (DOE) Hydrogen Program, spearheaded by the Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office (HFTO) within the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), is central to realizing this vision. The program actively supports over 400 projects encompassing research and development (R&D), systems integration, and demonstration and deployment activities across the hydrogen value chain. A cornerstone of the DOE's efforts is the "Hydrogen Shot" initiative, which ambitiously aims to reduce the cost of clean hydrogen produced via electrolyzers (excluding delivery and dispensing costs) to $1 per kilogram ($1/kg) by 2031. This target is particularly significant given that current costs for electrolyzer-produced hydrogen range from $5/kg to $7/kg. The Multi-Year Program Plan (MYPP) complements this with a target of less than $7/kg for hydrogen dispensed at the pump for use in trucks by 2028.

Fiscal support for these initiatives is substantial. The President's budget request for the DOE hydrogen crosscutting initiative in FY2025 was $377.2 million. Beyond annual appropriations, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), provides significant multi-year funding. This includes $8 billion specifically allocated for the development of Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs ($1.6 billion per year from FY2022 through FY2026) and additional funds earmarked for clean hydrogen manufacturing, recycling R&D, and electrolysis technology advancement.

Production Pathways, Cost Dynamics (incl. "Hydrogen Shot"), and IRA Incentives

The U.S. strategy emphasizes "clean hydrogen," a designation that encompasses various production pathways with low lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions. Prominent among these are green hydrogen, produced via electrolysis powered by renewable energy sources (like solar and wind) or nuclear power, and blue hydrogen, derived from natural gas through processes like steam methane reforming (SMR) or autothermal reforming (ATR) coupled with carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS).

Cost reduction is a primary focus. Current delivered hydrogen costs range from $12/kg to $16/kg , highlighting the challenge in reaching the $1/kg "Hydrogen Shot" target. Industry projections suggest that green hydrogen production costs could decrease by 60-80% by 2030, driven by declining electrolyzer costs and cheaper renewable electricity.

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 introduced a pivotal incentive: the Section 45V Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit. This credit offers up to $3.00/kg of qualified clean hydrogen, with the exact amount tiered based on the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the production process and adherence to prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements. Final rules for the 45V credit, issued by the Treasury Department in early 2025, provided crucial clarity regarding eligibility criteria. For electrolytic hydrogen (green or "pink" if nuclear-powered) to qualify for the highest credit tiers using Energy Attribute Certificates (EACs), producers must meet stringent requirements for incrementality (new clean power generation), deliverability, and temporal matching (electricity generation matched to hydrogen production, transitioning to hourly matching by 2030, an extension from the initially proposed 2028 deadline).

Key Applications, Market Development, and Infrastructure Needs by 2025

Clean hydrogen is envisioned for a diverse array of applications, particularly in sectors that are challenging to decarbonize through direct electrification. These include industrial processes such as petroleum refining, ammonia production (a key component of fertilizers), and steelmaking; heavy-duty transportation (trucks, buses, maritime); materials handling equipment like forklifts; and emerging uses in grid balancing and potentially as a clean power source for energy-intensive data centers. The DOE's H2@Scale initiative is actively exploring these cross-sectoral applications to foster integrated hydrogen energy systems.

Market development is being actively stimulated. The BIL-funded Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs program is a cornerstone of this effort, designed to de-risk large-scale hydrogen projects by co-locating production, infrastructure, and end-users, thereby creating initial demand certainty. In January 2024, the DOE also announced the selection of private partners to manage a demand-side support program aimed at further de-risking clean hydrogen projects and bolstering demand.

Significant infrastructure development is paramount for a thriving hydrogen economy. This includes the construction of new hydrogen production facilities (electrolyzers, reformers with CCUS), dedicated hydrogen storage solutions (geological, tanks), and extensive transportation networks, which may involve new pipelines, retrofitting existing natural gas pipelines, or specialized carriers for liquid hydrogen or hydrogen-based fuels.

Challenges: Scaling Production, Water Consumption, Lifecycle Emissions, and Regulatory Hurdles

Despite the strategic focus and financial incentives, the path to a large-scale clean hydrogen economy by 2025 and beyond is fraught with challenges. Transitioning from pilot projects to commercial-scale production remains a significant hurdle. The current high costs of clean hydrogen compared to fossil-based alternatives, coupled with technological uncertainties and a lack of robust market signals, act as considerable barriers to widespread demand growth and adoption by end-users.

Water consumption is another critical consideration. The electrolysis process fundamentally requires approximately 9 liters (L) of water to produce 1 kg of hydrogen. However, when accounting for water purification (electrolyzers require high-purity water) and process cooling, the total operational water consumption typically ranges from 20 to 30 L/kg of H2. An NREL presentation notes a figure of 3.78 gallons (approximately 14.3 L) of water for 1 kg of H2 produced via electrolysis. This consumption is comparable to, or in some cases less than, fossil-based hydrogen production methods, which can require 20 to 40 L/kg H2, not including significant upstream water use for natural gas extraction. While national-level water demand for hydrogen may be manageable, water scarcity in specific regions, particularly arid areas suitable for solar-powered electrolysis, poses a significant concern. This necessitates efficient process design, the use of air cooling where feasible, and exploration of alternative water sources such as treated wastewater or desalinated seawater.

Lifecycle GHG emissions are a determining factor for the "cleanliness" of hydrogen and its eligibility for the 45V tax credit, which requires lifecycle emissions to be no greater than 4 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO_2e) per kilogram of hydrogen (kgCO_2e/kgH_2) for some tier of credit. Hydrogen produced from unabated steam methane reforming of natural gas (SMR-NG, often termed "gray" hydrogen) has high lifecycle emissions, typically ranging from 9.3 to 12.4 kgCO_2e/kgH_2. Autothermal reforming (ATR) of natural gas with CCUS ("blue" hydrogen) can achieve significantly lower emissions, in the range of 3.3 to 3.9 kgCO_2e/kgH_2. For electrolytic hydrogen ("green" or "pink"), lifecycle emissions are primarily determined by the carbon intensity of the electricity source. Using solar power can result in emissions around 2.1 to 2.4 kgCO_2e/kgH_2, while nuclear power can yield emissions as low as 0.3 to 0.6 kgCO_2e/kgH_2.

Regulatory hurdles also persist. These include challenges related to siting, permitting, and installation of hydrogen production facilities, storage infrastructure, and transportation networks across the entire value chain. There is a pressing need for clear, streamlined, and consistent regulatory frameworks, particularly for enabling technologies like CCUS and for the safe handling and transport of hydrogen. Some states, for instance, require water use permits if water is consumed for construction or operation, and projects must also comply with state-level requirements for threatened and endangered species. California, for example, is working to establish a unified permit application for CCUS projects.

The stringent criteria for "clean" hydrogen under the IRA's 45V tax credit—particularly the requirements for incrementality, temporal matching, and deliverability for electrolytic hydrogen sourced via EACs —present a complex challenge. While these rules are vital for ensuring genuine emissions reductions and preventing the diversion of existing clean electricity from other uses, they also impose significant operational and financial hurdles for hydrogen producers. Meeting these criteria, especially the transition to hourly matching of electricity generation with hydrogen production by 2030, necessitates sophisticated energy sourcing strategies. This may involve developing dedicated renewable or nuclear power plants co-located with hydrogen facilities or engaging in complex EAC tracking and procurement systems. These requirements can add substantial cost and complexity, particularly for projects aiming to qualify for the most lucrative credit tiers. Consequently, while safeguarding environmental integrity, these regulations might inadvertently slow the initial uptake of clean hydrogen and increase costs for early-mover projects. This could delay the point at which green hydrogen achieves cost parity with conventional grey or blue hydrogen , potentially creating tension with the rapid scaling needed to meet the DOE's "Hydrogen Shot" cost targets and national production ambitions.

Moreover, while national projections suggest that the overall water footprint of a future green hydrogen economy might be manageable , the geographical concentration of development, particularly through the Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs program , could create localized water stress. Many regions identified as optimal for renewable energy generation (e.g., solar power in arid southwestern states) or industrial integration are simultaneously facing existing or emerging water scarcity challenges. The substantial water demand of large-scale electrolysis facilities (20-30 L of purified water per kg of H2 produced ) in these hubs could intensify competition for limited water resources with established users such as agriculture, municipalities, and ecological systems. This potential for localized water conflict could emerge as a significant permitting impediment and a source of public opposition, potentially delaying the development and operationalization of these critical hubs if proactive water management strategies—including the widespread adoption of desalination, wastewater recycling, and advanced water-efficient cooling technologies—are not integrated into project planning from the outset.

The following table provides a comparative overview of key metrics for different clean hydrogen production pathways relevant to the 2025 outlook:

Table 1: Green Hydrogen Production – Cost Projections, Targets, and Key Metrics (2025)

Production Pathway

Current Estimated Production Cost (pre-incentive, /kg H_2)

DOE "Hydrogen Shot" Target (/kg H_2, by 2031, production only)

Max IRA 45V Credit (/kg H_2)

Illustrative Lifecycle GHG Emissions (kgCO_2e/kgH_2)

Typical Water Consumption (L/kgH_2)

Key Data Sources

Electrolysis via Grid (Avg. US Mix)

$5 - $7+

$1.00

Up to $3.00 (if grid is very clean)

Highly variable (depends on grid mix, can be >4)

$20 - $30

Electrolysis via New Renewables

$3 - $6

$1.00

$3.00

$0.4 - $2.4 (solar higher, wind/hydro lower)

$20 - $30

Electrolysis via Nuclear

$4 - $7 (depends on electricity price)

$1.00

$3.00

$0.3 - $0.6

$20 - $30

Natural Gas Reforming with CCS (Blue H2)

$1.5 - $3.5

N/A (Hydrogen Shot focuses on electrolytic)

Up to $1.00 (depending on CCS efficiency & emissions)

$1.5 - $3.9 (highly dependent on CH4 leakage & capture rate)

$20 - $40

Note: Costs are illustrative and can vary significantly based on electricity/gas prices, technology, scale, and specific project parameters. Lifecycle GHG emissions for blue hydrogen are particularly sensitive to upstream methane emissions and CO2 capture rates. Water consumption includes process needs and purification.

4. Advanced Nuclear Reactors: A New Dawn for Nuclear Power

SMR Deployment Landscape in 2025: Key Projects, DOE Funding, and Timelines

The landscape for advanced nuclear reactors, particularly Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), is marked by increasing momentum in 2025, driven by significant federal support and tangible progress in key projects. In a clear signal of this commitment, the Department of Energy (DOE) re-issued a $900 million funding opportunity announcement (FOA) in March 2025 aimed at accelerating the commercial deployment of American-made Generation III+ SMRs, with applications due by April 23, 2025. This initiative, a collaborative effort between DOE's Office of Nuclear Energy and the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations, with crucial support from the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) for safeguards and security by design , is structured in two tiers. Tier 1 allocates up to $800 million to support up to two "first mover" teams—comprising utilities, reactor vendors, constructors, and end-users—committed to deploying an initial SMR plant and fostering a multi-reactor order book. Tier 2 provides approximately $100 million to "fast follower" projects, addressing key gaps in areas such as design finalization, licensing, supply chain development, and site preparation to spur additional deployments.

Several specific SMR projects are reaching important milestones with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in 2025:

• X-energy (Long Mott Generating Station): On March 31, 2025, Long Mott Energy, LLC, a subsidiary of The Dow Chemical Company, submitted a construction permit application (CPA) to the NRC for its proposed plant in Calhoun County, Texas. This facility would demonstrate X-energy's high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) technology and is supported by the DOE's Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP). The NRC staff's acceptance review of this application is currently underway.

• TerraPower (Kemmerer Power Station Unit 1): For TerraPower's proposed sodium fast reactor in Kemmerer, Wyoming, the NRC completed its draft safety evaluation (SE) with open items for the CPA on February 26, 2025. The agency is targeting completion of the final SE by June 2026, potentially ahead of the original schedule. Further facilitating project progress, the NRC granted an exemption on May 7, 2025, allowing certain early construction activities on the non-nuclear "energy island" to proceed while the CPA review continues.

• Microreactors: The NRC is also actively engaging with the emerging microreactor sector. On February 24, 2025, the agency published a new webpage dedicated to microreactors and, on February 20, 2025, held a public workshop to discuss its draft Integrated Microreactor Activities Plan, signaling a proactive approach to regulating these very small reactor designs.

These developments occur against a backdrop where global nuclear power generation is anticipated by the International Energy Agency to reach a new all-time high by 2025, indicating a broader resurgence of interest in nuclear energy.

Technological Profile: Leading SMR Designs and Innovations

The SMR domain is characterized by a rich diversity of designs, with over 80 distinct concepts under development globally. In the United States, several designs are prominent. NuScale Power's VOYGR™ power plant, featuring 77 MWe modules, holds the distinction of being the first SMR design certified by the U.S. NRC. Other significant contenders include GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy's BWRX-300, a 300 MWe boiling water reactor, and Westinghouse's AP300, a 300 MWe pressurized water reactor based on its proven AP1000 technology. Beyond these light-water reactor (LWR) designs, innovation is flourishing with companies like Holtec International (also developing an LWR SMR), Oklo Inc. (advancing very small liquid-metal-cooled fast reactors), and Seaborg Technologies (developing molten salt reactors).

SMRs offer several technological advantages. Their inherent scalability allows for capacity to be tailored to specific needs, and their modular construction is intended to enable factory fabrication of components, potentially reducing construction times and costs compared to large, site-built reactors. This modularity also supports flexible deployment options, making SMRs suitable for remote locations, powering industrial facilities, or integrating with variable renewable energy sources to provide grid stability. Many advanced SMR designs can produce high-temperature process heat, making them attractive for applications beyond electricity generation, such as hydrogen production, industrial steam supply, and desalination. Enhanced safety is a paramount design goal for virtually all SMRs, with many incorporating passive safety systems that rely on natural forces like gravity and convection to cool the reactor and prevent accidents, rather than requiring active human intervention or external power.

Regulatory Environment: NRC Licensing and Oversight for Advanced Reactors

The NRC is playing a critical role in enabling the deployment of these new reactor technologies. The agency is actively reviewing applications for advanced reactors, as seen with the X-energy and TerraPower projects , and is concurrently developing and refining its regulatory framework to accommodate the novel features of SMRs and microreactors. To assist potential applicants, the NRC published a "Prospective Applicant Guide" on February 3, 2025, providing information and guidance for entities developing new reactor designs.

Despite this progress, significant licensing and deployment challenges persist. The complexity of first-of-a-kind (FOAK) reviews, the need to establish new regulatory precedents for non-LWR designs, and the extensive safety and environmental analyses required contribute to lengthy and resource-intensive licensing processes. Adding another layer of complexity, the Supreme Court of the United States is currently examining the NRC's authority to issue licenses for interim storage facilities for nuclear waste, a decision that could have broader implications for waste management strategies.

State-level legislative and regulatory activity concerning nuclear energy and SMRs is varied and evolving. Some states are taking proactive steps to facilitate SMR deployment. For example, Arizona's House Bill 2774, passed by the House, would allow industrial users to construct SMRs at their facilities without requiring a certificate of environmental compatibility and would exempt SMRs from certain local zoning restrictions in smaller counties. Similarly, Colorado's House Bill 1040 aims to include nuclear energy in the state's definition of clean energy, making it eligible for clean energy targets. Conversely, other states, like Hawaii, maintain bans or significant hurdles for new nuclear construction. This patchwork of state policies creates an uneven landscape for SMR developers and investors.

Economic Viability: LCOE Analysis, Investment Climate, and Market Risks

The economic viability of SMRs is a subject of intense scrutiny and considerable uncertainty, particularly in 2025. First-of-a-kind (FOAK) SMR projects are widely expected to be expensive, with levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) that could exceed those of existing large-scale nuclear reactors and currently be higher than competing energy sources like natural gas, solar, and wind. The cancellation of NuScale Power's Carbon Free Power Project in Utah in 2023, after projected costs escalated significantly (leading to an estimated LCOE of $89/MWh even with substantial federal subsidies, and per-megawatt capital costs exceeding $20 million ), serves as a stark reminder of these economic challenges. A 2024 DOE "Liftoff Report" on advanced nuclear power modeled a median capital cost per megawatt for SMRs that was over 50% higher than for large reactors, suggesting that if SMRs become commercial, they might initially lead to higher electricity prices.

However, proponents argue that SMRs hold the long-term potential for significant cost reductions. KPMG, for instance, estimates that with scaled production and learning effects, SMR LCOE could eventually fall to the $50-$75/MWh range, making them competitive with intermittent renewables but offering the benefit of firm, dispatchable power. The primary pathway to these cost reductions lies in achieving economies of scale through factory manufacturing of standardized modules, which is theorized to drive down costs according to Wright's Law (learning curve effects). The challenge, however, is that realizing such scale with over 80 different SMR designs currently in development globally is a formidable task.

The investment climate for SMRs is buoyed by strong government support, exemplified by the DOE's $900 million FOA and various provisions within the IRA, such as the 45V tax credit which can benefit nuclear-powered hydrogen production. There is also growing interest from the private sector, particularly from tech companies looking to secure reliable, carbon-free power for data centers and AI operations; Amazon, Google, and Microsoft have reportedly entered into agreements or discussions with SMR developers. The global SMR market is projected to grow substantially, potentially reaching $295 billion by 2043.

Despite these positive signals, market risks remain substantial. These include technical risks related to the performance, fuel utilization, and operational reliability of novel reactor designs; intense competition from other energy sources; potential supply chain bottlenecks for specialized components and materials; and the persistent hurdle of lengthy and complex regulatory approvals. Construction timelines for nuclear projects in the U.S. and Europe have historically been long, often 10-12 years or more, which can significantly impact project financing and overall costs.

Environmental Profile: Waste Management, Land and Water Use

The environmental profile of SMRs, like all nuclear technologies, involves careful consideration of radioactive waste management, land utilization, and water consumption.

• Waste Management: SMRs will produce radioactive waste, including spent nuclear fuel, which is classified as high-level radioactive waste (HLW). In the United States, there is currently no permanent geological repository for HLW. Consequently, spent fuel from existing reactors is stored on-site, typically in specially designed pools and then transferred to dry cask storage units. This on-site storage solution would also apply to SMRs until a long-term disposal pathway is established. SMRs will also generate low-level radioactive waste (LLRW), such as contaminated tools and clothing, which is temporarily stored on-site before potential transfer to LLRW disposal facilities. Effective cradle-to-grave management of the nuclear fuel cycle remains a critical aspect of SMR deployment.

• Land Use: A significant advantage of SMRs is their comparatively small land footprint. A proposed 920 MWe NuScale SMR power plant, for example, is estimated to require approximately 35 acres of land. This translates to about 0.038 acres per megawatt (acres/MW). In contrast, a traditional large-scale nuclear plant of similar capacity might require around 500 to 640 acres (0.5 to 0.64 acres/MW), and a 1,000 MWe utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) plant could require 5,000 to 10,000 acres (5 to 10 acres/MW), depending on location and technology. This reduced land requirement can ease siting constraints and lessen environmental impact.

• Water Use: Nuclear power plants, including SMRs, require water for cooling their steam turbines. Most of this water is typically returned to its source, albeit at a higher temperature. In terms of water consumption (water withdrawn but not returned), nuclear energy generally uses more water per megawatt-hour (MWh) than wind or solar PV but less than some other renewable sources like geothermal or concentrating solar power. With growing concerns about water availability and increasing competition for water resources, particularly in certain regions of the U.S., water use by SMRs will be an important factor in siting and environmental assessments.

Public Perception and Community Engagement

Public perception of nuclear energy in the U.S. has shown a trend towards increased support in recent years. A 2024 survey conducted by Savanta on behalf of Radiant Energy Group, covering 23 U.S. states, found that support for nuclear energy (40%) outweighed opposition (27%) by a factor of 1.5, with every surveyed state showing net support. The highest levels of support were recorded in Georgia, Texas, and Arizona. A national Gallup poll conducted in March 2025 indicated that 61% of U.S. adults favor the use of nuclear energy.

Support for nuclear energy appears to be less politically polarized than for other clean energy technologies like wind and solar. While Republican voters tend to show higher net support for nuclear energy (a 21 percentage point higher net support compared to Democrats in the Radiant/Savanta poll), the partisan gap is considerably narrower than for wind or solar, which Democrats favor more strongly. Reliability is cited as the highest-priority energy attribute by the public, and nuclear energy is viewed as the most reliable thermal energy source.

Despite growing support, public concerns persist. A plurality of respondents (43% in the Radiant/Savanta poll) perceive nuclear energy as creating moderate or high levels of carbon emissions, indicating a potential misunderstanding of its lifecycle emissions profile. Concerns regarding nuclear safety and the long-term management of radioactive waste remain significant and are relatively evenly spread across the country, even in states with historical nuclear controversies such as Pennsylvania (Three Mile Island), Washington (Hanford site), and Nevada (proposed Yucca Mountain repository). The time it takes to construct nuclear plants is also a concern, though notably, states like Georgia and South Carolina, which have experienced significant construction delays with large reactor projects, still exhibit strong support for nuclear energy. Demographically, support for nuclear energy is typically highest among men, individuals who report being more knowledgeable about how nuclear energy works, older age groups (65+), higher earners, and those with higher educational attainment.

The primary hurdle for SMRs in 2025 and the near future lies in navigating the "valley of death"—bridging the gap between the high costs and substantial risks associated with first-of-a-kind (FOAK) projects and achieving a scale of deployment where factory-based manufacturing and accumulated learning can drive down the LCOE to levels competitive with other energy sources. The significant expense and financial risk of initial SMRs, as exemplified by the terminated NuScale project in Utah , underscore this challenge. The promise of SMRs hinges on the idea that modularity and factory production can lead to substantial cost reductions over time. However, a considerable chasm exists between current FOAK cost estimates and the Nth-of-a-kind (NOAK) LCOE required for widespread commercial adoption. The DOE's $900 million funding opportunity is a critical mechanism aimed at de-risking these early projects for "first movers" and "fast followers." The emphasis within this funding on creating a credible and sustainable pathway to a multi-reactor order book is particularly important, as it signals future demand necessary to incentivize manufacturers to invest in scaled production capabilities. Without such sustained support and clear market signals, SMRs risk remaining niche technologies or failing to achieve commercial viability.

Concurrently, while national opinion polls indicate a generally improving sentiment towards nuclear energy , translating this broad support into local acceptance for specific SMR projects—securing the "social license to operate"—will require diligent and proactive efforts. Generic national support does not automatically equate to community willingness to host a nuclear facility. Persistent public concerns regarding safety and radioactive waste management must be addressed transparently and comprehensively at the local level. SMRs possess attributes that could be advantageous in community discussions, such as their smaller physical footprint and the potential for diverse applications like providing process heat for local industries or powering remote communities. However, these benefits must be clearly communicated, and tangible local advantages, such as job creation and economic development, must be demonstrated. State-level policies will also play a significant role in determining siting feasibility, with supportive frameworks like Arizona's proposed HB 2774 facilitating deployment, while restrictive policies in other states (e.g., Hawaii ) will effectively preclude it. Failure to secure this social license through robust community engagement and transparent risk communication can lead to project delays or cancellations, irrespective of the technology's technical merits or broader national support. The need for industry advocacy, as mentioned in relation to SMR deployment challenges , underscores the importance of these engagement efforts.

The following table provides an overview of leading SMR designs anticipated to be active in the U.S. landscape in 2025:

Table 2: Status of Leading SMR Designs in the US – 2025 Outlook

Vendor

SMR Design/Type

Capacity (MW per module/plant)

Key Features

NRC Licensing Status/Timeline (as of early 2025)

Notable Projects/Partnerships (US Focus)

Key 2025 Milestones Anticipated

X-energy

Xe-100 (HTGR)

80 MWe per module (plant typically 320 MWe)

TRISO fuel, high-temp steam/heat output, passive safety

CPA submitted (Mar 2025) for Long Mott Generating Station, NRC acceptance review ongoing

Dow Chemical (Long Mott project, TX), DOE ARDP support

NRC acceptance decision on CPA; progress on detailed design for ARDP.

TerraPower

Natrium™ (Sodium Fast Reactor with molten salt storage)

345 MWe

Liquid sodium coolant, energy storage for flexible output, can use HALEU fuel

Draft SE with open items for CPA issued (Feb 2025); Final SE targeted June 2026. Exemption for EI construction granted (May 2025).

Kemmerer Power Station (WY), DOE ARDP support, PacifiCorp

Continued NRC review of CPA; site preparation activities at Kemmerer.

NuScale Power

VOYGR™ (LWR)

77 MWe per module (up to 12 modules/plant, e.g., 924 MWe)

NRC Design Certified (first SMR), passive safety, scalable

Standard Design Approval (SDA) issued. Focus on specific plant license applications.

Potential utility partnerships (post-CFPP cancellation).

Seeking new utility partners/projects; potential pre-application activities for new sites.

GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy

BWRX-300 (LWR - Boiling Water Reactor)

300 MWe

Based on licensed ESBWR design, passive safety, simplified design

Pre-application engagement with NRC. Targeting CPA submission.

Ontario Power Generation (Canada - Darlington site, first deployment planned); Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) exploring for Clinch River site.

Progress towards CPA submission for a US site (e.g., TVA); continued international deployment efforts.

Westinghouse

AP300™ SMR (LWR - Pressurized Water Reactor)

300 MWe

Based on licensed AP1000 technology, passive safety, rapid load-follow

Pre-application engagement with NRC.

Announced intentions to seek licensing in US and Europe.

Continued pre-licensing activities with NRC; potential partnership announcements.

Holtec International

SMR-300 (LWR - Pressurized Water Reactor)

300 MWe

Passive safety, underground containment, designed for diverse siting

Pre-application engagement with NRC.

Exploring deployment at Palisades site (MI) post-shutdown of large reactor; Entergy partnership.

Continued pre-licensing activities; progress on Palisades site evaluation.

Note: Timelines and milestones are subject to change based on regulatory processes, funding, and project-specific developments.

5. Grid Modernization: The Backbone of the Energy Transition

State of the US Grid and Modernization Imperatives for 2025

The U.S. electric grid, a marvel of 20th-century engineering, is now facing the profound challenges of the 21st century. A significant portion of this critical infrastructure is aging, with over 70% of transmission lines and power transformers being more than 25 years old. This aging infrastructure was primarily designed for a paradigm of centralized power generation and unidirectional electricity flow, rendering it increasingly ill-suited to meet the demands of a rapidly evolving energy landscape characterized by distributed energy resources (DERs), bidirectional power flows, increasing electrification of transportation and buildings, and the need to integrate vast quantities of variable renewable energy.

Modernization of the electric grid is therefore not merely an upgrade but an imperative for ensuring the nation's energy security, economic prosperity, and environmental sustainability. Key objectives of grid modernization include enhancing resilience against extreme weather events and cyber threats, improving reliability and reducing outages, accommodating new clean energy sources efficiently, enabling consumer participation in energy management, and supporting overall decarbonization goals. Despite significant investments flowing from legislation like the IIJA, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 2025 Report Card for America's Infrastructure downgraded the energy sector, citing persistent concerns related to capacity adequacy to meet future needs, the condition of existing assets, and safety considerations. This underscores the magnitude of the task ahead.

Key Initiatives: Smart Grids, Energy Storage, Virtual Power Plants, and Transmission Enhancements

Recognizing these imperatives, states and utilities across the U.S. are actively pursuing a range of grid modernization initiatives. In the first quarter of 2025 alone, 47 states, along with the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, took a total of 362 policy and deployment actions related to grid modernization. Key areas of focus include:

• Smart Grid Technologies and Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI): Smart grid deployment was a significant area of activity, with 31 distinct actions taken in Q1 2025. Smart meters, a foundational component of smart grids, enable two-way digital communication between utilities and customers, facilitating real-time data exchange, remote outage detection, and more sophisticated demand management programs.

• Energy Storage Systems: This was the most active area of grid modernization in Q1 2025, with 52 related actions. Energy storage, predominantly battery storage, is crucial for enhancing grid stability, integrating intermittent renewable energy sources by storing excess generation for later use, meeting peak electricity demand, and providing ancillary services.

• Virtual Power Plants (VPPs): Utilities are increasingly exploring VPPs, which aggregate disparate DERs such as residential solar PV systems, behind-the-meter batteries, and controllable loads to provide grid services collectively. States like Colorado and Georgia saw utilities proposing new VPP programs in early 2025, aiming to leverage these distributed assets for both distribution and transmission level benefits.

• Transmission Enhancements: Modernizing and expanding the transmission network is vital for delivering power from often remote renewable generation sites to load centers and for improving interregional power transfer capabilities. This includes the deployment of Grid Enhancing Technologies (GETs)—such as Dynamic Line Ratings (DLRs), Ambient Adjusted Line Ratings (AARs), advanced power flow controllers, and topology optimization software—which can increase the capacity and efficiency of existing transmission lines. High-performance conductors are also being considered for new and reconductored lines. A notable development in early 2025 was the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) approval of the Southwest Power Pool's (SPP) Markets+ tariff, a day-ahead and real-time energy market designed to enhance capacity and flexibility for the Western Interconnection, set for full operation in 2027.

• Other Initiatives: Significant activity is also occurring in areas such as developing advanced microgrids for resilience, implementing demand response programs, and reforming utility business models and rate structures. This includes the adoption of time-varying rates like critical peak pricing by multiple state regulators in Q1 2025, designed to incentivize customers to shift electricity consumption away from periods of high demand.

Investment Landscape, Economic Impacts, and Benefits

The scale of investment required for comprehensive grid modernization is substantial. The IIJA has provided an unprecedented level of federal funding to support these efforts. The DOE's Grid Modernization Initiative (GMI) and the newly established Grid Deployment Office are pivotal in coordinating federal R&D and deployment programs. Initiatives like the "Building a Better Grid Awards," announced in January 2025, channel federal funds towards high-impact transmission and grid resilience projects.

The economic benefits of grid modernization are compelling. For instance, a 2021 study by the Brattle Group and WATT Coalition found that the strategic implementation of GETs alone could yield approximately $5 billion in annual energy production cost savings, potentially double the amount of renewable energy integrated onto the grid without requiring large-scale new transmission expansions, and contribute to significant carbon emission reductions. Modernization efforts also stimulate economic growth by creating jobs in manufacturing, installation, and operation of new grid technologies and by enabling a more efficient and reliable electricity supply for businesses.

However, the economic landscape in 2025 presents headwinds. Rising capital costs, driven by inflation and higher interest rates, pose challenges for financing capital-intensive grid infrastructure projects. The Federal Reserve is expected to maintain relatively high borrowing costs through 2025, which will continue to exert pressure on project financing.

Critical Challenges: Cybersecurity, Interconnection Queues, Permitting Reform, and Aging Infrastructure

Despite the acknowledged benefits and ongoing initiatives, the path to a fully modernized grid is impeded by several critical challenges:

• Cybersecurity: As the grid becomes more digitized, interconnected, and reliant on operational technology (OT) systems, its vulnerability to cyber threats increases significantly. The proliferation of DERs and smart devices expands the potential attack surface. A concerning trend is that utilities may not own or directly operate many of these newly connected technologies (e.g., customer-sited DERs, third-party inverters), creating distributed security responsibilities and complex coordination challenges. Cyberattacks targeting utilities reportedly increased by 71% in the past year alone. In response, the DOE is developing guidance for inverter cybersecurity and promoting secure-by-design principles for energy management software.

• Interconnection Queues: The process for connecting new generation and storage resources to the transmission grid is plagued by extensive delays and growing backlogs, with wait times stretching up to six years in some regions. These interconnection logjams represent a major bottleneck to deploying clean energy at the pace required. Recognizing this, interconnection rules reform was a prominent area of action by states in Q1 2025, with 32 related measures taken.

• Permitting Reform: Streamlining the permitting processes for new transmission lines and other critical grid infrastructure is essential to accelerate deployment. The January 2025 "Unleashing American Energy" Executive Order directed changes to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) implementation with the stated aim of expediting permitting, but these changes also involve limiting the scope of environmental considerations. Following this, a federal court ruling in February 2025 vacated a key NEPA implementation rule, and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) subsequently issued an interim-final rule rescinding all of its NEPA implementing regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508). The ultimate impact of these changes on project timelines and environmental review quality remains a critical uncertainty.

• Aging Infrastructure: The sheer scale of aging grid components necessitates proactive and substantial investment in replacement, refurbishment, predictive maintenance strategies, and advanced diagnostic tools to prevent failures and ensure continued reliability.

• Workforce Challenges: The energy transition requires a skilled workforce proficient in modern grid technologies, data analytics, and cybersecurity. Attracting, training, and retaining this talent is a vital challenge for utilities and the broader energy sector.

The persistent and growing interconnection queues represent a formidable bottleneck that could severely constrain the pace of clean energy integration in 2025 and beyond. Even with significant policy support for renewables and storage, and notable technological advancements, the inability to connect these resources to the grid in a timely fashion effectively caps deployment rates. New clean energy projects—be they solar farms, wind installations, battery storage facilities, or potentially SMRs and grid-connected hydrogen electrolyzers—are rendered inert if they cannot achieve interconnection. The fact that interconnection rules reform was a leading action item for states in the first quarter of 2025, with 32 distinct actions taken , highlights the pervasiveness and urgency of this problem. This is not merely an administrative hurdle but a systemic constraint that can negate the benefits of increased clean energy manufacturing, cost reductions in generation technologies, and growing demand for clean power. It directly impacts the nation's ability to meet the surging electricity demand identified by S&P Global with clean, domestically produced energy.

Simultaneously, as grid modernization accelerates through the deployment of smart technologies, distributed energy resources (DERs), and VPPs, the grid's attack surface for cyber threats expands exponentially. This escalating risk forms an Achilles' heel for the envisioned hyper-connected grid. Each new smart meter, inverter, or DER management system introduces potential vulnerabilities. The challenge is significantly compounded by the diverse ownership and operational control of many new grid-connected assets. Unlike traditional utility-owned and centrally managed infrastructure, a substantial portion of new DERs are customer-owned or operated by third parties, meaning utilities have diminished direct oversight of their security posture and update protocols. A successful, large-scale cyberattack could trigger cascading failures, disrupt essential services, and critically erode public trust in the modernized grid, thereby potentially slowing the adoption of otherwise beneficial advanced technologies. The reported 71% increase in cyberattacks on utilities over the past year demonstrates that this is an acute and growing, not merely theoretical, risk. The DOE's focus on developing secure-by-design software and cybersecurity best practices for components like inverters is a direct and necessary response to this escalating threat landscape.

The following table outlines key grid modernization technologies, their deployment status, and impact anticipated in 2025:

Table 3: Key Grid Modernization Technologies – Deployment Status and Impact (2025)

Technology Category

Function/Primary Benefit

2025 US Deployment Examples/Trends

Key Challenges to Wider 2025 Adoption

Key Data Sources

Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) / Smart Meters

Real-time energy usage data, remote meter reading, outage detection, enables demand response & time-varying rates.

Widespread deployment ongoing; 31 smart grid actions in Q1 2025 by states.

Cost of full rollout, data management & privacy, customer acceptance/education.

Utility-Scale Battery Storage

Grid stability, peak shaving, frequency regulation, renewable energy integration (smoothing intermittency), ancillary services.

Rapid growth; 52 energy storage actions in Q1 2025. Large projects in CA, TX, etc.

Cost (though declining), supply chain for critical minerals, interconnection delays, safety standards.

Behind-the-Meter (BTM) Storage (Residential/Commercial)

Customer bill savings (time-of-use arbitrage, demand charge reduction), backup power, participation in VPPs.

Growing adoption, often paired with solar PV. Utility programs emerging (e.g., CO, GA VPPs).

Upfront cost for consumers, interoperability standards, utility program design.

Virtual Power Plants (VPPs)

Aggregation and coordinated dispatch of DERs (solar, storage, EVs, smart thermostats) to provide grid services.

Pilot programs and early commercial deployments (e.g., Xcel Energy CO 125MW VPP proposal). Regulatory support growing.

Complex aggregation platforms, market participation rules, compensation mechanisms, cybersecurity of aggregated assets.

Grid Enhancing Technologies (GETs) (e.g., DLR, AAR, Power Flow Controllers, Topology Optimization)

Increase capacity & efficiency of existing transmission lines, reduce congestion, improve reliability.

Encouraged by lawmakers; some utility adoption. FERC approval of SPP Markets+ may drive more.

Utility adoption cautiousness, regulatory incentives for deployment, data requirements for dynamic ratings.

Microgrids

Localized grids that can disconnect from the main grid and operate autonomously, enhancing resilience for critical facilities or communities.

Increasing interest for resilience, especially in areas prone to outages. Support for on-site generation and storage.

Cost, complex control systems, interconnection standards with main grid, regulatory frameworks.

Advanced Distribution Management Systems (ADMS)

Enhanced monitoring, control, and optimization of distribution networks; improved fault detection, isolation, and restoration (FLISR).

Deployment by progressive utilities. Essential for managing high DER penetration.

Integration complexity with legacy systems, cost, data analytics capabilities, interoperability.

6. Strategic Synergies: Integrating Hydrogen, Nuclear, and a Modernized Grid

The pursuit of a clean, reliable, and affordable energy future in the U.S. is significantly enhanced by exploring and exploiting the strategic synergies between hydrogen, advanced nuclear reactors, and a modernized electric grid. These three pillars, while possessing individual strengths, can achieve a far greater collective impact when integrated thoughtfully.

Nuclear-Powered Hydrogen Production: Technical and Economic Feasibility

Advanced nuclear reactors, particularly SMRs, offer a compelling proposition for the production of clean hydrogen, often termed "pink" hydrogen when nuclear electricity is used for electrolysis, or potentially more efficient production via high-temperature steam electrolysis (HTSE) if high-temperature SMR designs are employed. The continuous, weather-independent, and carbon-free power and heat generated by nuclear reactors can provide a stable and reliable energy source for electrolyzers, overcoming the intermittency challenges associated with some renewable energy sources. The DOE estimates that a single 1,000-megawatt (MW) nuclear power plant could produce up to 150,000 metric tons of hydrogen annually, suitable for various regional commodity markets.

The economic feasibility of nuclear-hydrogen production has been bolstered by recent policy developments. The final rules for the IRA's 45V Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit, issued in early 2025, provide clearer pathways for nuclear-generated electricity to qualify for the credit, particularly for existing plants at risk of retirement, reactors that have been shut down and are subsequently restarted, or facilities that undergo power uprates approved by the NRC. This incentivizes the utilization of existing and upgraded nuclear assets for clean hydrogen production.

Technological advancements are also promising. FuelCell Energy, in collaboration with the Idaho National Laboratory (INL), is currently testing its Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell (SOEC) system using simulated nuclear heat and power. This project aims to demonstrate the potential for achieving 100% electrical efficiency in hydrogen production by leveraging waste heat from nuclear reactors, which could reduce the cost of clean hydrogen by as much as 30%. Such integrated systems could also help nuclear power plants diversify their revenue streams by allowing them to switch between electricity generation for the grid and hydrogen production based on market conditions. Companies like First Nuclear Corp. are also envisioning business models centered on integrating SMRs with green hydrogen production, potentially offering "Hydrogen-as-a-Service" to industrial and transportation clients.

Hydrogen's Role in Grid Stability, Long-Duration Storage, and Sector Coupling

Clean hydrogen is poised to play a multifaceted role in enhancing the stability and flexibility of the electric grid. Electrolyzers, which produce hydrogen from electricity and water, can act as responsive loads on the grid. They can ramp their consumption up or down relatively quickly, helping to absorb surplus renewable generation during periods of low demand (thus reducing curtailment) or providing demand response services to maintain grid balance. This flexible operation can create an additional revenue stream for electricity generators, including nuclear plants.

Beyond its role as a flexible load, hydrogen offers significant potential for long-duration energy storage—a critical need in grids with high penetrations of variable renewable energy. While batteries are well-suited for short-duration storage (hours), hydrogen can be stored in large quantities (e.g., in geological formations or specialized tanks) for extended periods (days, weeks, or even seasonally), providing a means to shift energy over much longer timescales. This capability is vital for ensuring grid resilience and energy availability during prolonged periods of low renewable generation or high demand.

Furthermore, hydrogen is a key enabler of sector coupling—the integration of the electricity sector with other energy-consuming sectors like industry (e.g., steel, chemicals, refining) and transportation (e.g., heavy-duty trucks, shipping, aviation). By converting clean electricity into a chemical energy carrier (hydrogen), it becomes possible to decarbonize end-uses where direct electrification is technically challenging or economically prohibitive. NREL research extensively highlights these opportunities for hydrogen to provide grid services and facilitate the integration of high levels of variable renewables.

Optimizing Clean Energy Flows: The Role of an Intelligent and Flexible Grid

A modernized, intelligent, and flexible electric grid is the linchpin for realizing these synergies. Such a grid, equipped with smart controls, advanced sensors, widespread AMI, and integrated energy storage, is essential to manage the complex and dynamic interplay between variable renewable energy sources, firm nuclear power, and the flexible loads and generation potential associated with hydrogen production (electrolyzers) and use (fuel cells).

Technologies like VPPs can aggregate distributed hydrogen assets—such as smaller-scale electrolyzers located at industrial sites or fuel cells providing backup power—to participate in wholesale electricity markets or provide localized grid support. GETs, including advanced power flow control and dynamic line ratings, can optimize the utilization of existing transmission infrastructure, ensuring efficient power delivery from centralized nuclear plants to large-scale hydrogen production facilities, or from remote renewable sites to various loads, including electrolyzers. The grid must also be capable of accommodating significant bidirectional power flows and managing the new, potentially large and variable, load profiles presented by megawatt-scale electrolyzer installations.

The H2@Scale Initiative and its Progress

The DOE's H2@Scale initiative, led by the Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office, serves as a crucial framework for advancing the vision of an integrated hydrogen economy. H2@Scale aims to promote affordable hydrogen production, transport, storage, and utilization across multiple sectors of the U.S. economy. This initiative fosters collaboration between national laboratories (such as NREL, INL, Argonne National Laboratory, and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) and industry partners to conduct R&D and assess the technoeconomic potential of various hydrogen applications. A tangible example of H2@Scale in action is NREL's Advanced Research on Integrated Energy Systems (ARIES) platform, which features a 1.25 MW PEM electrolyzer, 600 kg of hydrogen storage, and a 1 MW fuel cell generator. This system serves as a research testbed to demonstrate direct renewable hydrogen production, energy storage, power generation, and grid integration at the megawatt scale, providing valuable data and insights for future deployments.

The combination of advanced nuclear reactors, particularly SMRs, with hydrogen production offers more than just a new source of clean fuel; it acts as a "decarbonization multiplier." SMRs can provide the consistent, carbon-free electricity and potentially high-temperature heat required for efficient electrolysis. This clean hydrogen can then be used to decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors like heavy industry (steel, cement, chemicals) and long-haul transportation, where direct electrification faces significant hurdles. Simultaneously, hydrogen production offers a valuable offtake for nuclear power, enhancing the economic proposition of nuclear assets. By providing a flexible demand source, hydrogen production can allow nuclear plants, which traditionally operate as baseload resources, to optimize their output, produce hydrogen during periods of low electricity prices or grid congestion, and thereby improve their overall capacity factors and revenue streams. This synergy is particularly relevant for SMRs seeking diverse market applications beyond bulk electricity generation. This coupling fosters a more resilient and adaptable clean energy system: nuclear energy provides the firm, dispatchable power essential for reliable hydrogen production, while hydrogen offers a storable energy carrier and demand-side flexibility that can complement intermittent renewable sources and enhance overall grid stability.

However, the full realization of these profound synergies between large-scale variable renewable generation, firm nuclear power, and the dynamic loads and resources associated with a hydrogen economy is critically dependent on the capabilities of the electric grid. A highly modernized, intelligent, and flexible grid acts as the central nervous system, essential for coordinating these complex interactions. Integrating intermittent renewables, dispatchable nuclear plants, large and potentially variable electrolyzer loads, and potentially distributed fuel cell generation necessitates sophisticated grid management systems. These systems must incorporate smart controls, real-time data analytics, advanced forecasting capabilities, robust demand response programs, and potentially new market mechanisms to value services such as rapid ramping from electrolyzers or firm capacity from hydrogen-fueled generation. Without such modernization, an un-evolved grid could lead to significant operational inefficiencies, such as the curtailment of renewable energy if hydrogen demand is not available or if the grid cannot manage the power flows, inefficient operation of nuclear plants unable to flexibly dispatch power to electrolyzers, or an inability to effectively deploy hydrogen-based storage to meet grid needs. Advanced grid technologies like VPPs could play a role in aggregating distributed electrolyzers or fuel cells, while GETs would be crucial for ensuring efficient power flow between nuclear generation sites and hydrogen production or consumption centers. Absent these advanced grid capabilities, the transformative vision of the H2@Scale initiative and the full decarbonization potential of these integrated technologies will remain significantly constrained.

7. Navigating the Policy and Regulatory Terrain in 2025

The advancement of hydrogen, advanced nuclear reactors, and grid modernization in the U.S. during 2025 is profoundly shaped by a complex and evolving policy and regulatory landscape. This terrain is characterized by foundational supportive legislation, primarily the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), juxtaposed with new Executive Orders issued in early 2025 that introduce significant uncertainties.

Maximizing the Impact of IRA and BIL for Hydrogen, Nuclear, and Grid Projects

The IRA and BIL have established a robust framework of financial incentives and direct funding mechanisms critical for de-risking and accelerating clean energy projects. Key IRA provisions include the Section 45V Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit, the Section 45X Advanced Manufacturing Production Tax Credit, and revised and extended Production Tax Credits (PTC) and Investment Tax Credits (ITC) applicable to nuclear generation, renewable energy, and energy storage. The BIL provides substantial direct appropriations for initiatives such as the Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs program ($8 billion), demonstration projects for advanced nuclear reactors including SMRs, and grants for grid resilience and modernization. The DOE's Loan Programs Office also plays an active role, providing debt financing for innovative energy projects, including recent disbursements for nuclear power plant projects.

For these legislative measures to achieve their intended impact in 2025, effective and timely implementation is paramount. This includes the issuance of clear and consistent guidance from federal agencies (such as the final rules for the 45V tax credit provided by the Treasury Department and IRS in early 2025 ), streamlined application processes for funding opportunities, and prompt disbursement of awarded funds. The continuity and predictability of these programs are essential for project developers and investors making long-term capital commitments.

Analysis of January 2025 "Unleashing American Energy" and April 2025 "Protecting American Energy From State Overreach" Executive Orders: Implications for Clean Energy Deployment

The policy environment in 2025 has been significantly altered by two key Executive Orders:

• The January 20, 2025, "Unleashing American Energy" Executive Order: This order signals a broad shift in federal energy policy, prioritizing the expansion of domestic fossil fuel production (oil, natural gas, coal) alongside other energy sources like nuclear, hydropower, biofuels, and critical minerals. It directs federal agencies to review all existing regulations, orders, guidance documents, and policies to identify any that impose an "undue burden" on the identification, development, or use of these domestic energy resources. Agencies are mandated to develop action plans to suspend, revise, or rescind such identified actions. Critically, this order revoked numerous prior executive orders focused on climate change and clean energy deployment. It also directed the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to repeal its regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In response, and following a February 3, 2025, court order that vacated a previous NEPA implementation rule, the CEQ published an interim-final rule on February 25, 2025, rescinding all NEPA implementing regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508). Furthermore, the order instituted an immediate 90-day pause on the disbursement of funds appropriated through the IRA and BIL, pending a review of their consistency with the new energy policy directives.

• Implications: This executive order introduces substantial uncertainty for the clean energy sector. It could lead to the reversal of supportive regulatory frameworks, disrupt the flow of previously legislated funding, and reorient federal resources towards fossil fuel development. The changes to NEPA implementation, while potentially streamlining permitting for all types of energy projects, also risk reducing the rigor of environmental reviews and could lead to increased litigation.

• The April 8, 2025, "Protecting American Energy From State Overreach" Executive Order: This order asserts that certain state and local laws and regulations, particularly those aimed at addressing climate change, undermine U.S. energy dominance and national security. It specifically targets state policies related to climate change, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives, environmental justice, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and mechanisms for collecting carbon penalties or taxes (e.g., California's cap-and-trade program, climate superfund laws in New York and Vermont). The order directs the U.S. Attorney General to identify such state policies and take appropriate actions to stop their enforcement, and to report on these actions and recommend further legislative or executive measures.

• Implications: This order directly challenges the authority of states to implement their own climate and clean energy policies, potentially leading to protracted legal battles and creating a less predictable and more fragmented regulatory environment for projects that may rely on state-level incentives, mandates, or carbon pricing mechanisms. The order has already reportedly impacted carbon allowance prices in California and Washington.

Addressing Regulatory Uncertainty and Ensuring Policy Coherence

The confluence of established supportive legislation like the IRA and BIL with the potentially countervailing directives of the 2025 Executive Orders creates a highly uncertain and complex policy milieu for investors, developers, and other stakeholders in the clean energy sector. Achieving policy coherence and reducing regulatory uncertainty will be a paramount challenge in 2025. Industry participants will urgently seek clarity on the long-term viability of federal incentives, the stability of environmental and siting regulations, and the federal government's commitment to previously stated clean energy goals. Robust and continuous engagement between federal agencies, state governments, industry representatives, and other stakeholders will be essential to navigate these changes and seek pathways that allow for continued progress on shared energy objectives.

The rapid and potentially drastic shifts in federal energy policy, as signaled by the 2025 Executive Orders , particularly the review of IRA/BIL funding disbursements and the targeting of established regulations, risk creating a significant "chilling effect" on private capital investment in long-cycle clean energy infrastructure. Projects like SMRs, regional hydrogen hubs, and major transmission line upgrades require substantial upfront capital and have multi-decade operational lifetimes. Investors in such large-scale infrastructure prioritize policy stability and regulatory predictability above almost all else. The prospect of abrupt rule changes, potential clawbacks of funding, or a withdrawal of federal support mid-stream, even if the underlying authorizing legislation like the IRA and BIL remains technically intact, can be a powerful deterrent. The 90-day pause on IRA and BIL fund disbursements mandated by the January 2025 Executive Order serves as a direct example of how administrative actions can disrupt project financing and timelines. This heightened uncertainty could lead to delayed Final Investment Decisions (FIDs), outright project cancellations, or a strategic shift by investors towards less capital-intensive projects with shorter payback periods. Such outcomes would inevitably slow the overall pace of the energy transition and hinder the achievement of specific 2025 goals for hydrogen deployment, SMR commercialization, and grid modernization.

Furthermore, the rescission of the CEQ's NEPA implementing regulations , driven by the January 2025 Executive Order's directive to facilitate and expedite the permitting of energy infrastructure , presents a complex calculus for project timelines. While the stated intent is to accelerate project approvals by reducing federal review burdens, this approach carries inherent risks. A less rigorous or narrowly defined NEPA process might lead to an inadequate assessment of potential environmental impacts—such as water resource demands for hydrogen production facilities, land use implications for SMR siting, or the ecological effects of new transmission corridors. This, in turn, could trigger an increase in legal challenges from environmental organizations, Indigenous groups, and affected local communities who perceive that their concerns are not being adequately addressed through the revised federal process. Consequently, project delays could merely shift from the administrative review phase to protracted court battles. Moreover, a perceived weakening of environmental scrutiny could erode public trust in the permitting process, further complicating efforts to secure the "social license to operate" for essential clean energy projects. This dynamic creates a double-edged sword where attempts to expedite projects could inadvertently lead to new forms of delay and heightened public opposition if not carefully managed.

The following table provides an overview of key federal policies and funding mechanisms relevant to U.S. clean energy efforts in hydrogen, nuclear, and grid modernization, with a focus on their status and implications in 2025:

Table 4: Overview of Key Federal Policies and Funding for US Clean Energy (Hydrogen, Nuclear, Grid) – 2025 Focus

Policy/Act/EO

Key Relevant Provisions for H2/Nuclear/Grid

Funding Allocated/Available or Policy Directive for 2025

Key Agencies Involved

Status/Recent Actions (as of mid-2025)

Key Data Sources

Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)

- Sec. 45V Clean Hydrogen PTC (up to $3/kg) <br> - Sec. 45X Advanced Manufacturing PTC <br> - Extended/enhanced PTC/ITC for new nuclear, renewables, storage

Tax credits available based on project qualification. Significant long-term fiscal impact projected ($936B - $1.97T over 10 yrs for all energy subsidies).

Treasury/IRS, DOE

45V final rules issued early 2025. Ongoing implementation and project uptake. Subject to review under Jan 2025 EO.

Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL)

- $8B for Regional Clean Hydrogen Hubs <br> - Funding for Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program (ARDP) <br> - Grants for Grid Resilience, Modernization, Transmission

Annual appropriations from multi-year authorizations (e.g., $1.6B/yr for H2 Hubs).

DOE, DOT, EPA

Hydrogen Hub selections made; ARDP projects ongoing. Subject to review and 90-day funding pause under Jan 2025 EO.

DOE SMR Funding Opportunity

$900M for Gen III+ SMR commercial deployment (First Movers & Fast Followers).

Up to $800M for Tier 1, ~$100M for Tier 2. Applications due April 23, 2025.

DOE (NE, OCED), NNSA

FOA re-issued March 2025. Awaiting award selections.

Jan 2025 EO "Unleashing American Energy"

- Review/rescind burdensome energy regs <br> - Revoke prior climate EOs <br> - Repeal NEPA regs <br> - Pause IRA/BIL fund disbursement (90 days)

Directive to prioritize domestic energy (incl. fossil fuels, nuclear). Mandates agency action plans.

All federal agencies, CEQ, OMB

Implementation ongoing. CEQ rescinded NEPA rules (Feb 2025). Funding pause impacting project timelines.

April 2025 EO "Protecting American Energy From State Overreach"

- Target state/local climate laws/regs (e.g., cap-and-trade, carbon taxes, ESG) <br> - Direct AG to stop enforcement of such policies

Directive to identify and challenge state policies deemed to burden domestic energy.

DOJ, State AGs

Implementation ongoing. Reported impact on CA/WA carbon markets. Potential for federal-state litigation.

8. Strategic Recommendations for Advancing Clean Energy in 2025

Navigating the complex and dynamic energy landscape of 2025 requires strategic, adaptable, and collaborative approaches from all stakeholders. The following recommendations are designed to help advance clean hydrogen, advanced nuclear energy, and grid modernization in the U.S., considering the prevailing policy context and identified challenges.

Policy Actions to Accelerate Deployment and Overcome Barriers

• For the Federal Government:

• Provide Regulatory Clarity and Stability: Urgently clarify the implementation pathways for IRA and BIL programs, particularly in light of the 2025 Executive Orders. Minimize disruptions to already awarded or committed funding to maintain investor confidence. Where reviews are mandated, conduct them transparently and expeditiously.

• Prioritize Strategic FOAK Investments: Continue robust funding and support for first-of-a-kind (FOAK) SMR demonstration projects and large-scale clean hydrogen production facilities that have clear technological merit and pathways to commercialization, leveraging programs like the DOE's $900M SMR solicitation and the Hydrogen Hubs initiative.

• Champion Balanced Permitting Reform: While streamlining permitting for all energy infrastructure is a stated goal , ensure that reforms maintain robust environmental safeguards and safety standards. Develop clear, consistent, and science-based criteria for environmental reviews to reduce litigation risk associated with perceived inadequacies in the NEPA process.

• Drive Comprehensive Interconnection Reform: Actively support and direct FERC to finalize and implement effective interconnection queue reforms that reduce backlogs, improve transparency, and facilitate the timely connection of new clean energy resources to the grid.

• Bolster National Grid Cybersecurity: Significantly increase investment in grid cybersecurity capabilities, including R&D for advanced threat detection and response, development of stringent security standards for all grid-connected devices (including DERs and inverters ), and establishment of clear roles and responsibilities for cybersecurity across diverse asset owners.

• For State Governments:

• Develop Supportive and Consistent Regulatory Frameworks: Where aligned with state energy and climate goals, proactively establish clear and supportive regulatory environments for SMR siting and deployment (learning from examples like Arizona HB 2774 ), hydrogen infrastructure development, and advanced grid technologies.

• Maximize Federal Funding Opportunities: Actively pursue and strategically deploy federal funding from the IRA and BIL to support state-level clean energy projects, grid modernization initiatives, and workforce development programs.

• Foster Regional Collaboration: Enhance cooperation with neighboring states on critical regional infrastructure, such as interstate transmission lines to unlock renewable resources and potential hydrogen pipeline networks, to achieve economies of scale and optimize resource utilization.

• Prioritize Early and Transparent Community Engagement: For all significant energy projects, especially SMRs and hydrogen facilities, engage with local communities early and transparently to address concerns (particularly regarding safety, waste, and local impacts ), build trust, and ensure that projects deliver tangible local benefits.

Recommendations for R&D, Infrastructure Development, and Public-Private Partnerships

1. Targeted R&D for Cost Reduction and Domestic Supply Chains: Focus federal and private R&D investment on innovations that demonstrably reduce the production costs of SMRs and clean hydrogen electrolyzers, improve their performance and efficiency, and help establish secure and resilient domestic supply chains for critical components and materials.

2. Strategic Infrastructure Build-Out: Prioritize the planning and development of essential shared infrastructure, including CO2 transport pipelines and permanent geological storage sites for blue hydrogen production (where applicable), and dedicated hydrogen pipelines or alternative carrier infrastructure for transporting clean hydrogen to end-users.

3. Strengthen Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Enhance the structure and effectiveness of PPPs for large-scale demonstration and deployment projects, such as the Hydrogen Hubs and ARDP SMR projects. Ensure clear risk allocation, robust project management, and strong offtake agreements or other demand-side supports to improve project bankability.

Strategies for Fostering Innovation While Ensuring Energy Security and Affordability

1. Value Resilience and Reliability Attributes: Encourage the development of market-based mechanisms and regulatory frameworks that appropriately value the grid reliability, resilience, and decarbonization attributes of firm clean power sources like nuclear energy and flexible resources like hydrogen-based energy storage and generation.

2. Invest in a Skilled Clean Energy Workforce: Implement and expand comprehensive workforce development and training programs to create a diverse and skilled labor pool capable of manufacturing, constructing, operating, and maintaining advanced nuclear facilities, hydrogen systems, and modernized grid infrastructure.

3. Balance Transition Pace with Consumer Affordability: Carefully manage the pace of the energy transition to ensure that energy remains affordable for all consumers. Strategically utilize federal and state incentives to mitigate potential cost impacts of new technologies on ratepayers, particularly for vulnerable communities.

Given the significant policy volatility evident in 2025, stakeholders in the clean energy sector—including industry players, supportive state governments, and non-governmental organizations—must proactively develop strategies that build "policy resilience." This involves diversifying funding sources beyond sole reliance on federal appropriations where feasible, prioritizing projects that exhibit strong intrinsic economic viability even with potentially reduced or uncertain subsidies, and actively working to build broad, bipartisan public support by highlighting local economic benefits such as job creation and tax revenue. The generally favorable public opinion towards nuclear energy, for instance , can be leveraged to bolster support for SMR projects. Furthermore, preparedness for legal and regulatory advocacy will be crucial to defend beneficial existing policies and investments made under the framework of laws like the IRA and BIL, and to counter unfavorable regulatory interpretations or actions stemming from the 2025 Executive Orders.

In such an uncertain policy environment, strategic investments in "no regrets" infrastructure and foundational technologies become even more critical. These are areas that offer broad benefits across multiple potential decarbonization scenarios and are inherently less susceptible to short-term policy shifts. Key among these is continued, aggressive grid modernization, particularly the expansion and upgrading of electricity transmission capacity and the enhancement of cybersecurity measures —both essential regardless of the specific future generation mix. Sustained R&D in next-generation SMR designs, more efficient and durable electrolyzer technologies, and innovative carbon capture and utilization methods can yield long-term technological advantages that retain their value even if near-term deployment incentives fluctuate. Finally, investing in workforce development to create a skilled talent pool for the clean energy economy is a foundational prerequisite for any large-scale energy transition. These types of investments are often less politically contentious and provide enabling capabilities that support a wider array of future energy options, making them prudent and resilient choices in a dynamic landscape.

9. Conclusion: Charting a Resilient Path to a Clean US Energy Future

The United States in 2025 is at a defining moment in its journey towards a cleaner and more secure energy system. The integrated potential of clean hydrogen, advanced nuclear reactors (particularly SMRs), and comprehensive grid modernization offers a powerful, synergistic pathway to significantly transform the nation's energy landscape. These technologies collectively hold the promise of deep decarbonization across multiple sectors, enhanced domestic energy security, substantial economic growth through innovation and new industries, and improved environmental outcomes.

Hydrogen stands ready to emerge as a versatile energy carrier, capable of tackling emissions in hard-to-abate industrial and transportation sectors while also offering valuable grid balancing and long-duration storage services. Advanced nuclear reactors, with SMRs at the forefront, offer the prospect of firm, dispatchable, and carbon-free electricity and process heat, with designs that promise enhanced safety, scalability, and flexible deployment options. A modernized, intelligent, and resilient electric grid is the indispensable backbone that will enable the seamless integration of these new resources, manage increasingly complex energy flows, and reliably meet the nation's growing and evolving electricity demands.

However, the outlook for 2025 and beyond is characterized by a duality of immense opportunity and significant challenge. The technological progress in these fields is tangible, and prior federal policy support through landmark legislation like the IRA and BIL has laid a strong foundation for investment and deployment. Yet, this momentum is now confronted by considerable headwinds. New policy uncertainties arising from Executive Orders issued in early 2025 have introduced a degree of unpredictability regarding the federal government's long-term commitment to specific clean energy pathways and the stability of regulatory frameworks. Persistent economic hurdles, such as the high upfront costs of first-of-a-kind technologies and the challenges of achieving commercial scale, remain. Furthermore, logistical and infrastructural barriers, including supply chain vulnerabilities, lengthy permitting and interconnection processes, and the imperative for robust cybersecurity, must be overcome.

Achieving the nation's long-term clean energy goals will require an unwavering and sustained commitment from policymakers at all levels of government, as well as from industry, researchers, and investors. This commitment must be coupled with a strategic agility—an ability to adapt to evolving technological breakthroughs, shifting economic conditions, and a dynamic political landscape. The path forward will necessitate careful navigation of the inherent tensions between ambitious decarbonization targets and the practical realities of project development, infrastructure build-out, and public acceptance in a complex and often contested environment. By fostering collaboration, prioritizing strategic investments, and cultivating policy resilience, the United States can chart a resilient course towards a cleaner, more secure, and prosperous energy future.

Works cited

1. A Look Ahead at Clean Energy in 2025, https://www.energy.gov/eere/look-ahead-clean-energy-2025 2. Contents - Department of Energy, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2025-01/doe-fy-2022-2026-strategic-framework.pdf 3. 10 Major Nuclear Energy Developments to Watch in 2025, https://www.nuclearbusiness-platform.com/media/insights/10-major-nuclear-energy-developments-to-watch-in-2025 4. New Report Finds Urgent Need to Expand Energy Supply to Meet ..., https://cleanpower.org/news/us-national-power-demand-study/ 5. Navigating 4 key trends and challenges shaping the power industry ..., https://www.utilitydive.com/news/trends-challenges-utility-power-industry-workforce-doble/747199/ 6. DOE Hydrogen Program Appropriations: FY2025 - Every CRS Report, https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/IF12699.epub 7. Study Shows Abundant Opportunities for Hydrogen in a Future Integrated Energy System, https://www.nrel.gov/news/detail/program/2020/study-shows-abundant-opportunities-for-hydrogen-in-a-future-integrated-energy-system 8. First Hydrogen Launches First Nuclear To Advance Clean Energy ..., https://firsthydrogen.com/first-hydrogen-launches-first-nuclear-to-advance-clean-energy-with-smrs/ 9. The 50 States of Grid Modernization: Utilities Pursue Tools for ..., https://nccleantech.ncsu.edu/2025/04/24/the-50-states-of-grid-modernization-utilities-pursue-tools-for-demand-management-and-grid-flexibility-in-q1-2025/ 10. Grid Modernization Initiative | Department of Energy, https://www.energy.gov/topics/grid-modernization-initiative 11. www.mckinsey.com, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/one-year-into-the-bil-catalyzing-us-investments-in-energy#:~:text=The%20goals%20of%20the%20largest,energy%20efficiency%2C%20and%20fund%20R%26D. 12. www.energy.gov, https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/hydrogen-production-tax-credit-explained-nuclear-power-plants#:~:text=The%2045V%20Clean%20Hydrogen%20Production%20Tax%20Credit%20was%20established%20under,of%20up%20to%20%243.00%2Fkilogram. 13. The Budgetary Cost of the Inflation Reduction Act's Energy Subsidies | Cato Institute, https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/budgetary-cost-inflation-reduction-acts-energy-subsidies 14. The Budgetary Cost of the Inflation Reduction Act's Energy Subsidies - Cato Institute, https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2025-03/Policy-Analysis-992-Update-2.pdf 15. Unleashing American Energy – The White House, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/unleashing-american-energy/ 16. Executive Order Targeting State Energy Regulations: Impacts and ..., https://www.lathamreg.com/2025/04/executive-order-targeting-state-energy-regulations-impacts-and-responses-from-states/ 17. The 2025 Energy Economy: A New Era of Growth, Disruption, and Uncertainty - West Monroe, https://www.westmonroe.com/insights/the-2025-energy-economy-a-new-era-of-growth-disruption-and-uncertainty 18. Advanced Grid Technologies: Governor Leadership to Spur Innovation and Adoption, https://www.nga.org/publications/advanced-grid-technologies-governor-leadership-to-spur-innovation-and-adoption/ 19. U.S. National Hydrogen Strategy and Roadmap | Hydrogen Program, https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/library/roadmaps-vision/clean-hydrogen-strategy-roadmap 20. DOE Hydrogen Program Appropriations: FY2025 | Congress.gov ..., https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12699 21. Environmental life-cycle analysis of hydrogen technology pathways in the United States - Frontiers, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/energy-research/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1473383/epub 22. Environmental life-cycle analysis of hydrogen technology pathways in the United States, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385320238_Environmental_life-cycle_analysis_of_hydrogen_technology_pathways_in_the_United_States 23. Is Clean Hydrogen Production a Good Fit for Questa? Intermediate Feasibility Study Results - NREL, https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/86665.pdf 24. Green Hydrogen Costs to Drop 60-80% by 2030 as Industry Shifts Towards Sustainable Energy - New Global Hydrogen Market Report 2025 Released - GlobeNewswire, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/03/06/3037977/28124/en/Green-Hydrogen-Costs-to-Drop-60-80-by-2030-as-Industry-Shifts-Towards-Sustainable-Energy-New-Global-Hydrogen-Market-Report-2025-Released.html 25. U.S. Department of the Treasury Releases Final Rules for Clean Hydrogen Production Tax Credit, https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy2768 26. The Hydrogen Production Tax Credit Explained for Nuclear Power ..., https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/hydrogen-production-tax-credit-explained-nuclear-power-plants 27. New Research Collaboration To Advance Megawatt-Scale ... - NREL, https://www.nrel.gov/grid/news/program/2022/new-research-collaboration-to-advance-megawatt-scale-hydrogen-fuel-cell-systems 28. Stimulating Clean Hydrogen Demand: The Current Landscape - Belfer Center, https://www.belfercenter.org/research-analysis/stimulating-clean-hydrogen-demand-current-landscape 29. Regulatory Framework for Hydrogen in the U.S. - Clean Air Task Force, https://www.catf.us/resource/regulatory-framework-hydrogen-us/ 30. Hydrogen Reality Check: Distilling Green Hydrogen's Water ... - RMI, https://rmi.org/hydrogen-reality-check-distilling-green-hydrogens-water-consumption/ 31. $900 Million Available to Unlock Commercial Deployment of ..., https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/900-million-available-unlock-commercial-deployment-american-made-small-modular-reactors 32. Department of Energy Reissues $900M Opportunity for Generation III+ Small Modular Reactors Under Trump Administration - McAllister & Quinn, https://jm-aq.com/department-of-energy-reissues-900m-opportunity-for-generation-iii-small-modular-reactors-under-trump-administration/ 33. 2025 | NRC.gov, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/advanced/highlights/2025.html 34. Advanced Small Modular Reactors - Idaho National Laboratory, https://inl.gov/trending-topics/small-modular-reactors/ 35. Small Modular Reactors: A Realist Approach to the Future of ..., https://itif.org/publications/2025/04/14/small-modular-reactors-a-realist-approach-to-the-future-of-nuclear-power/ 36. SMR Current Status: Development Needs and Global Perspectives - INL Digital Library - Idaho National Laboratory, https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites/sti/sti/Sort_109856.pdf 37. News Reactor | March 2025 - National Conference of State Legislatures, https://www.ncsl.org/newsletter/details/news-reactor-march-2025-1 38. Smaller nuclear reactors (SMRs) are a costly dead end, especially for AI - CDN, https://bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/web.sas.upenn.edu/dist/0/896/files/2025/04/SMR-Dead-End-4-14-25-FINAL-1.pdf 39. Small Modular Reactors: Redefining Global Energy Security for a Digitalized Future - Strategy International · Think Tank & Consulting Services, https://strategyinternational.org/2025/02/05/publication161/ 40. Nuclear Power Plants | US EPA, https://www.epa.gov/radtown/nuclear-power-plants 41. Cooling Water Issues & Opportunities at US nuclear power plants - Department of Energy, https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/DOE-Cooling%20Water%20Issues%20&%20Opportunities.pdf 42. US Public Attitudes toward Clean Energy 2024 - Nuclear, https://www.radiantenergygroup.com/reports/us-public-attitudes-toward-clean-energy-2024-nuclear 43. Surveys show US public support for nuclear energy, https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/surveys-show-widespread-us-public-support-for-nuclear-energy 44. DOE SMR Workshop - The Pathway to SMR Commercialization - Bethesda, Maryland - Department of Energy, https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/doe-smr-workshop-pathway-smr-commercialization 45. GRID MODERNIZATION - DSIRE Insight, https://www.dsireinsight.com/s/Q12025_gridmod_exec_final.pdf 46. America's Infrastructure 2025, https://infrastructurereportcard.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Executive-Summary-2025-Natl-IRC-WEB.pdf 47. New US cybersecurity implementation plan for energy modernization rolled out, https://industrialcyber.co/utilities-energy-power-water-waste/new-us-cybersecurity-implementation-plan-for-energy-modernization-rolled-out/ 48. Tracking regulatory changes in the second Trump administration, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/tracking-regulatory-changes-in-the-second-trump-administration/ 49. Idaho National Laboratory Testing of FuelCell ... - FuelCell Energy, Inc., https://investor.fce.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Idaho-National-Laboratory-Testing-of-FuelCell-Energys-Electrolyzer-to-Show-Further-Commercialization-Opportunity-for-Nuclear-Power-Plants/default.aspx 50. Systems Analysis | Hydrogen and Fuel Cells - NREL, https://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/systems-analysis 51. January 2025 Clean Energy Boom Report - Climate Power, https://climatepower.us/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/January-2025-Clean-Energy-Boom-Report.pdf