top of page
Search

US Foreign Policy in the Middle East: An Analysis of President Trump's May 2025 Visit to Saudi Arabia and Qatar


Trump Tour in Middle East
Trump Tour in Middle East

I. Introduction: Contextualizing US Engagement in the Middle East Amidst a Shifting Geopolitical Landscape

A. Addressing the User's Premise

This report addresses assertions that the United States political system is significantly influenced by Zionism, purportedly leading to governmental corruption and a foreign policy biased against Islam and the Middle East. Such claims raise fundamental questions regarding the primary drivers of US foreign policy, the nature of its alliances in the Middle East, and the objectives of regional leaders when engaging with Washington. The May 2025 visit of US President Donald Trump to Saudi Arabia and Qatar provides a contemporary case study through which to examine these complex dynamics, utilizing available information to offer an evidence-based analysis of the motivations and policy underpinnings shaping US engagement in this critical region.

B. President Trump's May 2025 Visit: A Snapshot of Evolving Dynamics

President Donald Trump's diplomatic tour in May 2025 included pivotal stops in Saudi Arabia on May 13-14 and Qatar on May 14-15.1 This visit occurred against a backdrop of significant regional turbulence and evolving policy postures. Key among these are the ongoing crisis in Gaza, the complex trajectory of US-Iran relations, and notable shifts in American policy towards Syria.2 The itinerary itself, concentrating on influential Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) partners and featuring high-level meetings with figures such as Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, and Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa, signaled a distinct set of priorities for the Trump administration.2

The broader context of this engagement is a US foreign policy under President Trump characterized by a pronounced skepticism towards "nation-builders" and "interventionists".2 Instead, the administration has articulated a preference for a pragmatic, often transactional, approach. This philosophy appears to prioritize perceived US national interests, economic prosperity through bilateral deals, and the establishment of regional stability via strategic realignments, rather than the promotion of democratic reforms or human rights as primary objectives.2 The visit and its outcomes thus offer a lens through which to assess the application of this foreign policy doctrine. The very nature of this "pragmatic" and deal-oriented foreign policy 2 introduces a complex dynamic when juxtaposed with assertions of a US system singularly driven by specific ideological influences. A transactional leader, by definition, seeks advantageous exchanges, which might lead to policy decisions based on the perceived immediate benefits of a deal rather than adherence to a fixed ideological script. This could result in actions that do not perfectly align with the presumed preferences of all traditionally influential domestic or international actors, creating a more multifaceted policy environment than a simple cause-and-effect relationship would suggest.

Furthermore, the intense focus of President Trump's visit on securing economic agreements and fostering specific security realignments 2 underscores that Gulf states are not merely passive recipients of US policy. Instead, they appear to be actively engaging with the Trump administration, seeking to leverage its transactional approach to advance their own strategic objectives. These objectives prominently include national economic diversification, as exemplified by Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 and Qatar's National Vision 2030 7, and the shaping of a regional security architecture that aligns with their interests. This suggests a degree of agency on the part of these Gulf nations in navigating and potentially influencing US policy priorities in the region to their benefit.

C. Purpose and Structure of the Report

This report aims to dissect the intricate dynamics at play during President Trump's May 2025 Middle East visit. It will analyze the motivations of Saudi Arabia and Qatar in their high-level engagements with the Trump administration. Concurrently, it will examine the stated policy objectives and discernible shifts in the US approach to the region as demonstrated during this period. A critical component of this analysis will involve an assessment of claims regarding external influences on US policy, drawing upon the available research to provide a nuanced perspective. The report will conclude by synthesizing these elements to foster a deeper understanding of the multifaceted interactions shaping US-Middle East relations.

II. The Trump Administration's Approach to the Middle East: A Doctrine of Pragmatic Transactionalism


A. Defining Trump's Foreign Policy Vision

The foreign policy doctrine articulated and enacted by the Trump administration during the May 2025 Middle East visit marks a discernible departure from several tenets of traditional US diplomacy. President Trump's public statements and policy actions consistently revealed a "disdain for 'nation-builders' and interventionists," instead championing a foreign policy vision "centered in pragmatism".2 This pragmatic approach emphasizes tangible, often immediate, outcomes, with a strong focus on economic benefits for the United States, encapsulated in the "America First" maxim. Regional stability, under this doctrine, is pursued through negotiated deals and strategic realignments rather than through ideological crusades or the active promotion of democratic institutions abroad.2 Official discourse during this period prioritized "economic prosperity and regional stability" over the advancement of "human rights and democracy promotion" as the primary drivers of US engagement.2

B. Key Policy Shifts and Initiatives Evident in May 2025

Several key policy initiatives and shifts were evident during President Trump's visit, illustrating the application of this pragmatic and transactional approach:

1. Syria: Engagement and Sanctions Relief

A pivotal development was President Trump's announcement of the lifting of US sanctions on Syria, coupled with a meeting with Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa. 2 This policy recalibration was reportedly influenced by advocacy from Gulf leaders and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who see the new Syrian government under al-Sharaa as a potential "bulwark against Iran's return to influence in Syria".2 The stated rationale for this rapprochement was to provide Syria with a "chance at peace" and a "fresh start".9 During their meeting, President Trump urged President al-Sharaa to move towards diplomatic recognition of Israel, expel "Palestinian terrorists" and all foreign "terrorists" from Syria, and actively participate in combating any resurgence of ISIS.5 This engagement represents a "strategic shift" in US policy towards Syria 9 and has been described as a "bold reset" 12, one that seemingly proceeded despite, or perhaps by sidelining, Israeli reservations concerning al-Sharaa's past as an insurgent leader.9

The decision to engage Syria under its new leadership is a significant test of the Trump administration's regional strategy. The policy shift, encouraged by regional partners like Saudi Arabia and Turkey 2, aims to achieve concrete outcomes such as stabilizing Syria, countering Iranian influence, and fostering an environment conducive to reconstruction.2 However, it involves engaging a leader with a controversial past, a move that has drawn caution from traditional allies like Israel.9 The success or failure of this initiative—whether it leads to a more stable, less Iran-aligned Syria and opens economic avenues, or conversely, empowers problematic elements or fails to achieve its stated goals—will heavily influence perceptions of President Trump's "dealmaker" diplomacy and the viability of his pragmatic vision for reshaping the region.

2. Iran: Dual Track of Diplomacy and Pressure

Towards Iran, the Trump administration pursued a dual-track strategy. President Trump extended an "olive branch to Iran," urging its leadership to enter negotiations for a comprehensive deal to curb its nuclear program.2 This diplomatic overture, which followed earlier rounds of talks facilitated by US special envoy Steve Witkoff 2, was accompanied by a stern warning: the opportunity for a diplomatic solution "won't last forever." Rejection of this offer, Trump cautioned, would result in "massive maximum pressure," including efforts to "drive Iranian oil exports to zero".2 A core demand within any potential agreement was that Tehran must cease its support for proxy groups throughout the region.13

3. Israeli-Palestinian Conflict & Regional Normalization

Regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and broader Arab-Israeli normalization, the Trump administration adopted a nuanced stance. While President Trump expressed a hope that Saudi Arabia would recognize Israel "in your own time" 2, the May 2025 visit signaled a de-prioritization of immediate Saudi-Israeli normalization as a prerequisite for other bilateral agreements between the US and Saudi Arabia. This marked a shift from the approach of the preceding Biden administration, which had actively pushed for such normalization.2 Saudi Arabia, for its part, consistently maintained that formal recognition of Israel remains contingent upon tangible progress towards the establishment of a Palestinian state based on 1967 borders 2—a condition deemed unlikely to be met by the contemporary Israeli government.3 President Trump acknowledged this Saudi position, noting that Riyadh is "not ready for this unless the Israelis are going to commit themselves to the Palestinian — to the establishment of a Palestinian state".15 Consequently, the diplomatic focus during the visit pivoted towards bilateral business and security deals, with "Israel 'normalisation' tak[ing] back seat".5

4. Emphasis on Economic Deals and Investment

The visit was overwhelmingly characterized by an emphasis on securing substantial economic commitments. Saudi Arabia announced a landmark $600 billion commitment for new investments in the United States.2 Concurrently, a significant $142 billion defense sales agreement was finalized between the US and Saudi Arabia.5 President Trump's rhetoric throughout the visit centered on fostering "commerce, not chaos" and encouraging the export of "technology, not terror" from the region.6 This transactional diplomacy explicitly aimed to translate robust economic ties into tangible benefits for the American economy, particularly job creation and investment opportunities.16 This heavy reliance on multi-billion dollar investment and defense agreements indicates that economic leverage is the principal instrument the Trump administration intends to wield to achieve its foreign policy objectives in the Gulf. This approach appears to overshadow more traditional diplomatic engagements or those centered on shared values, suggesting a belief that economic interdependence and mutual commercial advantage can more effectively forge strategic alignment.

C. The "America First" Doctrine in the Middle Eastern Context

The policy decisions and diplomatic overtures made during the May 2025 visit reflect a consistent application of the "America First" doctrine to the Middle Eastern geopolitical landscape. President Trump's actions demonstrated a clear intent to reshape US engagement in a manner that directly benefits American economic interests and narrowly defined security objectives. This approach sometimes necessitates a departure from long-standing policy orthodoxies or multilateral frameworks, prioritizing bilateral deals and tangible returns. The willingness to engage with former adversaries, such as the new leadership in Syria, or to exert pressure on traditional allies by de-linking issues like Israeli-Saudi normalization from other strategic agreements, showcases a flexible, albeit potentially unpredictable, application of this doctrine.

This transactionalism, while potentially opening new avenues for engagement or deal-making, such as with Syria or in renewed talks with Iran, also carries the risk of introducing instability into long-standing alliances. If US foreign policy is perceived by allies as being highly contingent on securing immediate "wins" for the incumbent US president, rather than on enduring shared strategic interests, these allies might begin to question the long-term reliability of American commitments. Such uncertainty could compel them to diversify their own strategic partnerships more aggressively, potentially including overtures to US rivals like China. This dynamic could, paradoxically, lead to a more fragmented regional order, less amenable to US influence, and ultimately complicate the achievement of long-term American strategic objectives if regional cooperation becomes less predictable and more conditional.

Table 1: Key US Policy Initiatives and Announcements (Trump Visit, May 2025)


Policy Area

Specific Action/Announcement

Stated US Rationale/Objective

Key Involved Actors (besides US)

Syria

Lifting US sanctions; Meeting with President Ahmad al-Sharaa.2 Urged recognition of Israel, deportation of terrorists, ISIS combat.5

Give Syria "a chance at peace," "fresh start"; Bulwark against Iran; Regional stability.2

Syria, Saudi Arabia, Turkey

Iran

Extended "olive branch" for nuclear deal talks; Threatened "massive maximum pressure" if rejected.2 Demanded end to proxy support.13

Curb Iran's nuclear program; Regional stability; Counter Iranian malign influence.2

Iran

Saudi-Israel Normalization

Expressed hope for eventual Saudi recognition of Israel "in your own time"; De-prioritized immediate normalization as precondition for other deals.2

Acknowledged Saudi conditions (Palestinian statehood); Focus on bilateral US-Saudi deals.2

Saudi Arabia, Israel

Economic Pacts (Saudi)

$600 billion Saudi investment commitment in the US; $142 billion defense sales agreement.2

Strengthen economic ties; Create US jobs; Bolster Saudi security; "Commerce, not chaos".6

Saudi Arabia

Economic Pacts (General)

Emphasis on economic prosperity and regional stability through deals; Rescinding "AI Diffusion Rule" to counter China.2

"America First"; Mutual economic benefit; Secure Gulf alignment against China in tech.6

Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE

III. Strategic Imperatives: Why Saudi Arabia and Qatar Engage with the Trump Administration

The decisions by Saudi Arabia and Qatar to engage robustly with the Trump administration during the May 2025 visit were driven by a confluence of distinct national interests, encompassing economic ambitions, security requirements, and diplomatic positioning within a complex regional and global environment.

A. Saudi Arabia's Calculus: Navigating Ambition and Security

For Saudi Arabia, the engagement with President Trump was multifaceted, reflecting its aspirations for economic transformation, the imperative to bolster national security, and the desire to assert its influence on the regional stage.

1. Economic Diversification and Growth (Vision 2030)

A paramount driver for Saudi Arabia's interaction with the Trump administration was the advancement of its ambitious Vision 2030 agenda, which aims to fundamentally diversify the Kingdom's economy away from its historical reliance on oil revenues.7 Attracting substantial US investment, technology, and expertise is central to this strategy. The widely publicized $600 billion commitment to invest in the United States serves as a cornerstone of this effort, signaling a deep strategic economic partnership.2 Beyond direct investment, Saudi Arabia actively sought US collaboration in cutting-edge sectors such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), advanced technology, and critical infrastructure development.6 President Trump, in turn, lauded Riyadh's emergence as a global business hub and acknowledged the significant growth in its non-oil sector revenues.18 A key technological interest for the Kingdom was securing access to advanced US semiconductor chips, a goal potentially facilitated by the Trump administration's decision to rescind the "AI Diffusion Rule," which had previously restricted such exports.6

2. Enhancing National Security

Bolstering national security remained a critical objective for Riyadh. The finalization of a $142 billion arms deal with the US underscores the Kingdom's commitment to modernizing its armed forces and enhancing its defense capabilities within a volatile region.5 This defense package reportedly encompassed advancements for the air force, missile defense systems, maritime and coastal security enhancements, and upgrades to border security and land forces modernization.17 Continuous cooperation with the US on counterterrorism initiatives and the management of regional threats, particularly those perceived to emanate from Iran and its allied proxy groups, was also a priority.2 In this context, the new Syrian government under President al-Sharaa was viewed by Riyadh as a potential "bulwark against Iran's return to influence in Syria," a development the Saudis seemingly encouraged the US to support.2 Furthermore, Saudi Arabia has been exploring avenues for civilian nuclear cooperation with the United States, partly as a means to diversify its domestic energy sources and potentially as a strategic hedge against any advancements in Iran's nuclear program.19

3. Regional Diplomacy and Influence

Saudi Arabia actively sought to leverage its engagement with the Trump administration to solidify its position as a leading regional power and an indispensable partner for the United States.15 The Kingdom's diplomatic influence was notably evident in its role in encouraging President Trump's policy shift regarding Syria.2 While maintaining an openness to eventual normalization of relations with Israel, Riyadh consistently reiterated its long-standing position that such a step must be preceded by meaningful progress towards the establishment of a Palestinian state. This stance aligns with broader Arab public sentiment and allows Saudi Arabia to maintain significant diplomatic leverage on this critical issue.2 Ultimately, the Kingdom's diplomatic efforts are geared towards fostering a stable regional environment conducive to the success of its ambitious economic development agenda.7 This includes a cautious de-escalation of tensions with Iran and a desire to find a resolution to the conflict in Yemen.7

The pursuit of massive economic deals with the US by Saudi Arabia is intrinsically linked to its security calculations. Investments in the US and the procurement of advanced American defense systems not only aim to diversify the Saudi economy and modernize its military but also serve to solidify the US security umbrella and partnership. This strategic partnership is still deemed crucial by Riyadh, even as it diversifies its international relations. By becoming a major investor in the US economy and a significant purchaser of US goods and services, Saudi Arabia increases its importance to American economic interests, thereby reinforcing the rationale for continued US security commitments in the region. This creates a mutually reinforcing dynamic where robust economic ties bolster security partnerships, and a strong security relationship, in turn, provides a stable environment conducive to economic development and investment.

B. Qatar's Objectives: Mediation, Security, and Economic Advancement

Qatar's engagement with President Trump was driven by a desire to strengthen its strategic partnership with the US, enhance its role as a key regional mediator, and advance its own economic development goals.

1. Strengthening Bilateral Ties and Strategic Partnership

Qatari officials characterized President Trump's visit as a "historic moment" and the "culmination of many years of diplomacy," reflecting Doha's ambition to bolster its status as a key US partner and a designated Major Non-NATO Ally.5 Discussions during the visit prominently featured military and security cooperation, leveraging Qatar's strategic importance as the host of Al Udeid Air Base, the largest US military installation in the Middle East.5 Economic cooperation was also a central theme. Qatar has already invested billions of dollars in the US economy and expressed keen interest in exploring further opportunities in diverse sectors including education, defense, trade, healthcare, energy, information technology, and communications, all of which align with the objectives of the Qatar National Vision 2030.8 Notably, the Trump Organization was reported to have entered into a new real estate development agreement in Qatar around this period.21

2. Regional Mediation and Diplomatic Role

Qatar actively sought to utilize the visit to enhance its established role as a "trusted mediator in regional diplomacy".8 This included ongoing efforts to broker a ceasefire in the Gaza conflict, a role in which Qatar has been instrumental.5 Furthermore, given its close ties with the new Syrian leadership under President al-Sharaa, Doha was reportedly interested in seeking US support for an easing of sanctions on Syria.5 The Qatari Emir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, publicly expressed hope that President Trump, whom he described as a "practical president" and a "man of peace," could leverage his influence to help bring peace and stability to the region.5

3. Navigating Complex Regional Dynamics

For Qatar, engagement with the Trump administration is a crucial component of its strategy to navigate the complex and often fraught geopolitical dynamics of the Middle East. This involves maintaining its influence and securing its national interests amidst regional power plays, including its relationships with Iran and other Gulf states. A strong partnership with the United States is viewed as essential for this delicate balancing act. The visit provided a valuable opportunity for Qatar to align with the US on pressing regional security challenges and to reinforce its strategic importance to Washington.5

The unified push by Gulf leaders, including those from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, alongside Turkey, for a US policy shift on Syria highlights a significant convergence of regional interests. These interests include countering perceived Iranian expansionism, stabilizing Syria to enable reconstruction and the return of refugees, and facilitating Syria's reintegration into the broader Arab political and economic sphere.2 President Trump's willingness to adopt this policy shift—lifting sanctions and engaging directly with President al-Sharaa—underscores the transactional nature of his foreign policy. If key regional partners advocate for a particular course of action, and if that action can be framed as aligning with a perceived US interest (such as countering Iran or achieving a diplomatic "deal"), the Trump administration has shown itself to be amenable, even if it means significantly altering previous US stances or potentially causing unease among other allies. Syria, in this context, became a notable instance where regional actors appeared to successfully influence US policy by appealing to the transactional proclivities of the Trump administration, framing the issue in terms of shared strategic benefits and a potential reshaping of regional alignments.

While both Saudi Arabia and Qatar are clearly focused on strengthening their ties with the United States, their significant investments and pursuit of advanced technology, such as AI chips 6, also reflect a broader, more sophisticated strategy of strategic hedging and diversification in an increasingly multipolar global landscape. Their engagement with the Trump administration is a critical component of their foreign policy, but it is not pursued in isolation. These Gulf states are simultaneously cultivating relationships with other global powers, including China, which is a major economic partner for the region.6 This multi-vector approach is designed to accelerate their national development programs, such as Vision 2030, and to enhance their strategic autonomy. The objective is not merely to align with US preferences but to secure their own long-term national interests in a world where the unipolar dominance of the US is perceived to be evolving. The deals struck with the US, particularly in sensitive areas like advanced technology and defense, are highly valued, but they are likely pursued as part of a wider portfolio of international partnerships, demonstrating a pragmatic adaptation to shifting global power dynamics.

Table 2: Comparative Strategic Objectives of Saudi Arabia and Qatar in Engagement with the Trump Administration (May 2025)


Strategic Domain

Saudi Arabia's Objectives & Key Actions

Qatar's Objectives & Key Actions

Economic Development & Vision Alignment

Advance Vision 2030; Attract US investment ($600bn pledge) & technology (AI, semiconductors); Grow non-oil sector.2

Advance Qatar National Vision 2030; Strengthen economic ties (existing billions invested); Seek cooperation in education, health, energy, IT, communications; Trump Org real estate deal.8

National & Regional Security

Modernize armed forces ($142bn US arms deal); Enhance counterterrorism cooperation; Counter Iran (view new Syrian govt as bulwark); Explore civilian nuclear cooperation with US.2

Bolster military/security cooperation (US base host); Align with US on regional security challenges; Enhance status as Major Non-NATO Ally.5

Diplomatic Influence & Mediation

Solidify role as key US regional partner; Influence US Syria policy; Maintain leverage on Israeli-Palestinian issue (normalization tied to Palestinian statehood); Foster regional stability for economic goals.2

Enhance role as "trusted mediator"; Mediate Gaza ceasefire; Seek US support for easing Syria sanctions; Emir hopes Trump can bring regional peace.5

Technology & Innovation

Secure access to advanced US semiconductor chips and AI technology; Foster partnerships for tech-driven economic diversification.6

Cooperate in IT and communications sectors; Attract US tech companies and investment to support National Vision 2030 goals.8

IV. Examining Claims of Influence and Bias in US Middle East Policy

A. The User's Assertion: "Zionist Influence" and "Corruption"

A central premise underlying the query for this report is the assertion that "Zionism" exerts significant influence over the US political system, leading to what is described as "open corruption of government" and a "biased secular justice system towards Islam and the Middle East." This section directly addresses these claims by examining the multifaceted nature of influence on US Middle East policy, drawing from the available information to move beyond singular explanations and explore a more complex interplay of factors.

B. Documented Perceptions and Realities of Influence

1. Perceived US Bias and Pro-Israel Lobbying

It is well-documented in academic discourse and public opinion analyses that many within the Muslim world perceive US foreign policy as exhibiting a consistent bias towards Israel. This perception is often attributed to several factors, including substantial US financial and military aid to Israel, consistent diplomatic support (such as the use of veto power in the UN Security Council), and the widely acknowledged influence of "the powerful Israel lobby" within the American political system.23 Such perceptions are frequently cited as a significant source of resentment and anti-American sentiment in parts of the Middle East and the broader Muslim world.23 Some scholars argue that what they term "unwavering support for Israel, driven by domestic political considerations," has had a tangible impact on peace efforts and regional dynamics.23

2. Christian Zionism and Political Alignments

Within the domestic political landscape of the United States, particularly within conservative and evangelical Christian circles often associated with the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement, Christian Zionist beliefs represent a significant ideological factor shaping views on the Middle East. Prominent figures within the Trump administration and its sphere of influence have been noted for their strong ties to this movement and, by extension, to right-wing political factions in Israel.24 This ideological alignment contributes to a robust pro-Israel stance within certain segments of the American political spectrum. It has also been observed that the Israeli government under Prime Minister Netanyahu has worked in "close coordination with a Zionist lobby that wields enormous influence," particularly among Republican policymakers.24

C. Trump's Transactionalism: A Complicating Factor?

The foreign policy approach of the Trump administration, characterized by its transactional nature and "America First" doctrine, introduces complexities to the narrative of singular or unconditional influence.

1. "America First" vs. Unconditional Support

While President Trump's first term in office included several policy decisions widely seen as favorable to Israel—such as the relocation of the US embassy to Jerusalem and the recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights 25—his overarching "America First" doctrine and fundamentally transactional approach to international relations can, and sometimes do, lead to policies that do not perfectly align with the immediate preferences or stated positions of the Israeli government.25

Several instances from the May 2025 visit illustrate this dynamic:

  • The de-prioritization of immediate Saudi-Israeli normalization, with the Trump administration acknowledging and respecting Saudi Arabia's timeline and its insistence on concessions related to Palestinian statehood, rather than making normalization a precondition for other US-Saudi agreements.2

  • The decision to engage Syria's new leader, Ahmad al-Sharaa, and lift sanctions on Syria—a move reportedly viewed with considerable skepticism and concern by Israel.9

  • The continued pursuit of nuclear negotiations with Iran, a diplomatic track that has historically been a point of significant contention and divergence between the US and certain Israeli governments.2

Some analyses suggest that President Trump views certain Israeli government policies or leadership figures, such as Prime Minister Netanyahu, as potential obstacles to achieving broader US strategic interests, particularly in fostering alliances and securing deals with wealthy Gulf states.25 Indeed, it has been posited that US foreign policy decisions under this administration might, in specific instances, reflect "much more what is Saudi Arabia's vision for peace and stability... more so than that of Israel".15 This suggests that while a baseline of strong US-Israel relations persists, the transactional nature of the Trump administration means that support is not necessarily unconditional and may be weighed against other perceived "America First" priorities. If an Israeli government's actions are perceived by the Trump administration to obstruct more significant "deals" or its broader regional strategy, particularly with influential Gulf states, friction can arise, and the US may pursue divergent paths.

2. The Primacy of "Deals"

A defining characteristic of President Trump's engagement with the Middle East, starkly evident during the May 2025 visit, is the overwhelming focus on "doing deals".6 This refers particularly to large-scale economic agreements with affluent Gulf nations, promising substantial investment in the US and significant arms sales.2 These deals, which are framed as directly benefiting the American economy through job creation and inward investment, appear to be a primary motivating factor for the administration, potentially outweighing other geopolitical or ideological considerations at critical junctures. The pursuit of a "new regional alliance," primarily with the Gulf states, aimed at strengthening American influence and economic ties, is identified as a key Trump objective.25 If the actions of any regional actor, including traditional allies, are perceived as hindering this overarching agenda, the Trump administration has shown a willingness to exert pressure or adjust its approach.

The US Middle East policy landscape appears less like a system dictated by a single, monolithic influence and more like a complex "marketplace." In this marketplace, various domestic and international actors, diverse lobbying groups (including pro-Israel organizations, Arab-American groups, and powerful business interests), and the specific priorities of the incumbent administration (such as President Trump's "America First" deal-making imperative) compete and interact. The resulting US policies are often the outcome of these intricate, sometimes conflicting, pressures and negotiations, rather than a straightforward directive from one dominant source. While pro-Israel influence is undeniably a significant and well-established factor in this equation, it does not operate in a vacuum. A transactional president like Trump might be more receptive to whichever "deal" or policy proposal offers the most perceived benefit to his administration's agenda, thereby creating openings for other actors—such as Saudi Arabia or Qatar with their substantial investment packages—to exert considerable influence on specific policy decisions. This dynamic complicates a simpler model of influence or "corruption" operating through a single, unchallenged vector.

D. Allegations of "Corruption" and Conflicts of Interest

The assertion of "open corruption" within the US government requires careful examination based on the available information. While the provided research does not directly substantiate systemic corruption in the broad sense implied by the query, it does highlight specific instances and concerns related to potential conflicts of interest involving the Trump family's business activities in the Middle East. These documented business interests, including new real estate development projects in Qatar and Saudi Arabia undertaken by the Trump Organization 21, coincide with regions where high-stakes diplomatic and economic negotiations were being conducted by the US government.

Critics, including research fellows from policy institutes, have pointed to these concurrent business ties as creating "a pretty glaring conflict of interest".22 The concern raised is that US foreign policy decisions could potentially be influenced, or perceived to be influenced, by the personal financial incentives of the President or his family.22 Furthermore, discussions surrounding Qatar's potential gift of a Boeing 747-8 jumbo jet to President Trump also brought forth questions regarding the US Constitution's Emoluments Clause, which is designed to prevent federal officials from receiving gifts or benefits from foreign governments without congressional consent.3 While President Trump framed the potential aircraft acquisition as a "gesture of good faith" from Qatar and a fiscally sound move for the United States 4, the situation fueled debate about ethical boundaries and improper influence.

The presence of significant Trump family business interests in the very regions where the administration is pursuing major diplomatic and economic deals inevitably blurs the lines between national interest and potential personal or familial gain.21 Even if specific policy decisions are publicly justified on the grounds of national benefit, the concurrent private financial activities create an unavoidable perception problem. This overlap makes it challenging to definitively disentangle purely national interests from potentially personal ones, thereby lending some credence to concerns about the integrity of the decision-making process. While not necessarily fitting a strict legal definition of "corruption" based solely on the provided information, the appearance of potential conflicts of interest can erode public trust and fuel perceptions of improper influence, aligning with a component of the user's initial concerns.

V. The Broader Geopolitical Landscape: Deals, Alliances, and Power Plays

A. The Primacy of Economic Statecraft

The May 2025 visit by President Trump to Saudi Arabia and Qatar emphatically underscored that economic agreements form the central currency of his administration's Middle East policy. Massive investment commitments, large-scale arms sales, and partnerships in technology and energy were the most prominent outcomes and focal points of the discussions.2 Saudi Arabia's pledge of $600 billion in new investments in the United States, coupled with a $142 billion defense deal, highlighted the sheer scale of this economic diplomacy.2 Similarly, Qatar's ongoing and newly discussed investments in the US economy across various sectors further emphasized this trend.8 These extensive economic engagements were consistently framed by all parties as mutually beneficial, designed to create jobs and stimulate economic growth in the US while simultaneously aiding the development and security objectives of the Gulf partner nations.16

B. Countering China's Influence

An undercurrent to the economic and strategic discussions during the visit was an apparent US objective to counter and outmaneuver China's growing influence in the Gulf region. This concern is particularly acute in critical sectors such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), semiconductors, and other advanced technologies.6 The Trump administration signaled a clear intent to secure closer and more exclusive relationships with the Gulf monarchies than those maintained by Beijing, even though China is a primary customer for the region's fossil fuels.6 A significant policy move in this context was the reported rescinding of the Biden administration's "AI Diffusion Rule." This rule had imposed restrictions on the export of advanced semiconductor chips to several countries, including the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Its removal was presented as a means to enable these Gulf states to partner more deeply with US technology firms, reportedly contingent on their willingness to limit their advanced technology collaborations with China.6 This strategy was framed as Washington "do[ing] its part" if Gulf nations demonstrate a commitment to "throw in their lot with the United States" in the burgeoning global technological competition.6 This explicit aim of countering China suggests that US Middle East policy under the Trump administration is increasingly viewed through the prism of great power competition. Alliances and deals in the region are therefore not solely about addressing regional dynamics but also about securing strategic loyalty and preferential access, especially in high-technology domains, vis-à-vis a global rival. This geopolitical imperative could lead the US to offer more favorable terms or make greater concessions to Gulf states to ensure they remain firmly aligned with Washington and resist deeper integration into China's technological or strategic orbit.

C. Implications for Regional Actors

The Trump administration's approach and the specific initiatives undertaken during the May 2025 visit have varied implications for key actors across the Middle East:

  • Iran: Tehran continues to face a dual approach from Washington: the offer of an "olive branch" for renewed nuclear negotiations, juxtaposed with the persistent threat of "massive maximum pressure" if diplomatic overtures are rejected.2 US efforts to bolster the military capabilities of Gulf Arab states and the strategic engagement with a new government in Syria are, in part, aimed at containing perceived Iranian influence in the region.2 Iran, however, has publicly dismissed US threats and is actively pursuing its own regional diplomatic initiatives, such as proposing a Gulf-inclusive uranium enrichment consortium as a means to reposition its nuclear program and potentially break out of international isolation.5

  • Syria: The decision by the Trump administration to lift US sanctions and engage directly with President Ahmad al-Sharaa offers Syria a potential pathway out of profound international isolation and towards much-needed reconstruction and economic recovery. This shift has received support from key Gulf states and Turkey.2 In return for this engagement, Syria is expected to reciprocate by actively combating terrorism, preventing the resurgence of groups like ISIS, and potentially moving towards diplomatic recognition of Israel.5 This represents a significant recalibration of US policy with potentially far-reaching consequences for Syria's future.

  • Israel: While remaining a strategic US ally, Israel has found some of the Trump administration's policies and diplomatic maneuvers to be sources of friction or unease. These include the direct US negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program 3, the de-prioritization of immediate Saudi-Israeli normalization on terms fully aligned with Israeli preferences 14, the engagement with Syria's new leader, Ahmad al-Sharaa, whom Israel views with deep suspicion 9, and a US agreement with Houthi rebels in Yemen that reportedly did not cover Houthi attacks against Israel.3 Some analysts have noted a trend whereby President Trump is "increasingly sidelining Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government to align U.S. foreign policy more closely with Ankara, Doha, and Riyadh" on specific regional issues.12 This has led to observations that the Trump administration, at times, appears to make a distinction, asserting that "US and Israeli interests are not one and the same".14 This indicates a potential recalibration of US priorities where the strategic and economic interests of Gulf Arab states, particularly in the context of countering China and advancing Trump's "America First" economic agenda, are gaining significant weight. This does not signify an abandonment of the US-Israel alliance, but rather suggests a more complex balancing act by Washington, where Israel's influence, while still potent, may face greater competition from other regional partners.

  • Turkey: Ankara has emerged as an influential actor, notably in shaping US policy towards the new government in Syria, often in concert with Gulf leaders.2 The planned meeting of top diplomats from the US, Turkey, and Syria to review the specifics of US sanctions relief further underscores Turkey's role in the evolving Syrian dynamic.5

President Trump's transactional approach to foreign policy, while potentially yielding short-term successes such as the new engagement with Syria or the announcement of large-scale investment deals, also carries inherent risks to regional stability. The focus on bilateral arrangements and immediate "wins" can sometimes come at the expense of traditional alliances or established multilateral frameworks. If not managed with foresight, this approach could inadvertently create new fault lines or exacerbate existing tensions. The aspirational goal of fostering "commerce, not chaos" 6 is laudable, but the methods employed—if perceived as benefiting only a select few, or if they disrupt delicate regional balances without establishing new, sustainable equilibria—might inadvertently lead to new forms of instability, resentment, or power vacuums that other regional or global actors could seek to exploit.

VI. Conclusion: Interpreting the Outcomes and Future Trajectories

A. Synthesizing Motivations and Outcomes

President Trump's May 2025 visit to Saudi Arabia and Qatar was driven by a confluence of distinct yet often overlapping objectives from all parties involved. For Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the primary motivations centered on advancing their ambitious national economic diversification plans (Vision 2030 and National Vision 2030, respectively), which necessitate significant foreign investment, technology transfer, and robust international partnerships. Concurrently, both Gulf nations sought to enhance their security through strengthened defense cooperation with the United States and to achieve regional stability conducive to their long-term development. They also aimed to increase their diplomatic influence, with Qatar emphasizing its role as a mediator and Saudi Arabia asserting its position as a leading regional power.

From the US perspective, under the Trump administration's "America First" doctrine, the visit was primarily geared towards securing massive economic deals—investments and arms sales—that would directly benefit the American economy. Broader geopolitical goals included countering China's growing influence in the region, pragmatically re-engaging with states like Syria to reshape regional dynamics (particularly concerning Iran's role), and maintaining a flexible, deal-oriented approach to longstanding conflicts such as the Israeli-Palestinian issue. The tangible outcomes of the visit included significant economic and defense agreements, most notably with Saudi Arabia, alongside notable diplomatic shifts concerning US policy towards Syria, the strategy for engaging Iran, and a nuanced stance on the timeline and conditions for Saudi-Israeli normalization.

B. Reassessing US Influence and the User's Premise

The evidence emerging from the May 2025 engagements suggests that US influence in the Middle East, while undeniably substantial, is neither monolithic nor solely dictated by any single domestic or external interest group, including "Zionist influence" as broadly characterized in the initial query. President Trump's distinctively transactional and "America First" approach to foreign policy introduces a dynamic wherein economic incentives, geopolitical maneuvering against global rivals like China, and the overarching pursuit of "deals" can lead to policy decisions that sometimes diverge from the immediate preferences of traditional allies, such as Israel, or the explicit expectations of specific domestic lobbies.

While pro-Israel sentiment and the associated lobbying efforts are undeniably potent forces within the US political system, and Christian Zionist perspectives hold sway within parts of the President's political base 23, the Trump administration's actions during this visit demonstrate a willingness to prioritize what it perceives as broader, or more immediately beneficial, American interests. These interests are often defined in economic terms or through the lens of strategic great power competition. Consequently, the notion of a US foreign policy singularly or uniformly directed by one specific influence vector appears overly simplistic when confronted with the complexities of a transactional presidency interacting with assertive regional powers pursuing their own multifaceted agendas.

Concerns regarding "corruption," as raised in the query, find some resonance not in direct evidence of systemic, illicit dealings from the provided materials, but rather in the documented potential for conflicts of interest arising from the Trump family's ongoing business enterprises in the very regions targeted for high-level diplomatic and economic engagement.22 Such overlaps can, at a minimum, create an appearance of impropriety that undermines public trust in the integrity of foreign policy decisions, irrespective of whether explicit quid-pro-quo arrangements are proven.

The "America First" policy, with its emphasis on tangible, often economic, benefits for the United States, paradoxically appears to cede a degree of agenda-setting power to resourceful international partners who can offer attractive "deals." If the primary metric for successful foreign policy under such an administration becomes quantifiable economic wins or clear geopolitical shifts against designated rivals, then nations like Saudi Arabia and Qatar—possessing significant capital, energy resources, and strategic locations—are well-positioned to shape US engagement to their advantage. They can achieve this by skillfully framing their own national objectives as aligning with, and contributing to, mutually beneficial "wins" for the Trump administration's declared agenda. This dynamic suggests that the transactional nature of "America First" can create increased leverage for those partners capable of delivering on the administration's preferred metrics.

C. Future Trajectories and Unanswered Questions

The long-term efficacy and consequences of President Trump's transactional foreign policy in the Middle East remain subjects of considerable uncertainty. The sustainability of initiatives such as the new engagement with Syria, the dual-track approach to Iran's nuclear program, and the strategy of building regional stability primarily through massive economic interdependence with Gulf states is yet to be determined. It is unclear whether these policies will ultimately lead to greater regional stability and shared prosperity, or inadvertently foster new forms of regional competition, instability, and unpredictability.

How traditional US allies in the region, most notably Israel, will adapt to an American foreign policy that, while generally supportive, demonstrates a capacity to prioritize transactional gains with other regional actors, sometimes at the expense of their immediate concerns, is a critical question.12 The evolving dynamics suggest a more complex and conditional alliance management approach from Washington.

Furthermore, the ability of Gulf states to successfully leverage their enhanced economic power and strategic partnerships with the US to achieve their ambitious long-term national visions, all while navigating the complexities of great power competition (particularly between the US and China) and persistent regional rivalries, will be a defining feature of the region's future.

Finally, a fundamental tension persists between the Trump administration's pursuit of stability through economic deals and pragmatic state-level alliances 2, and the deep-seated ideological, historical, and socio-political grievances that underlie many of the Middle East's most intractable conflicts, such as the Israeli-Palestinian issue.2 The current US approach, as evidenced by the May 2025 visit, largely sidesteps these core issues, deferring their resolution or making them conditional upon broader geopolitical realignments. While transactionalism might achieve temporary de-escalations or forge new economic partnerships, it is unlikely to resolve the fundamental conflicts or address the profound perceptions of injustice that fuel regional instability and animate much of the political discourse, including the concerns about bias that motivated the initial query. This gap between a transactional foreign policy and the requirements for lasting, equitable peace remains a critical challenge for US engagement in the Middle East.

Works cited

  1. en.wikipedia.org, accessed May 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidential_trips_made_by_Donald_Trump_(2025)

  2. Trump lays out Mideast vision as he looks to revamp US approach in Iran, Syria and beyond - AP News, accessed May 14, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-mideast-saudi-arabia-mbs-qatar-uae-b782fe922d09afced2e1074b65016e80

  3. Trump visiting Gulf Arab states while crises flare in Gaza and Iran - AP News, accessed May 14, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-middle-east-saudi-qatar-iran-israel-452018863e00f7739078d5b912293894

  4. Trump visiting Gulf Arab states while crises flare in Gaza and Iran | The Associated Press, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.ap.org/news-highlights/spotlights/2025/trump-visiting-gulf-arab-states-while-crises-flare-in-gaza-and-iran/

  5. Donald Trump live: President visits Qatar after meeting Syria's al-Sharaa - Al Jazeera, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/5/14/donald-trump-live-president-to-lift-syria-sanctions-heads-to-qatar-next

  6. Trump's remarkable Middle East tour is all about striking megadeals ..., accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/content-series/inflection-points/trumps-remarkable-middle-east-tour-is-all-about-striking-megadeals-and-outfoxing-china/

  7. Middle Eastern Geopolitical Dynamics and Strategic Implications for Iran - SpecialEurasia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.specialeurasia.com/2025/05/14/middle-eastern-geopolitics-iran/

  8. US President's Visit....Promising Prospects for ... - Qatar news agency, accessed May 14, 2025, https://qna.org.qa/en/News-Area/News/2025-5/14/us-presidents-visitpromising-prospects-for-strengthening-qatar-us-partnership

  9. Trump says he will ease sanctions on Syria and move to restore relations with new leader - AP News, accessed May 14, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/ahmad-alsharaa-trump-syria-bashar-al-assad-6facdef5b881286955b95e0c5b2704d7

  10. Trump meets with Syria's insurgent-turned-leader in Saudi Arabia, accessed May 14, 2025, https://spectrumlocalnews.com/me/maine/international/2025/05/14/trump-meets-syrian-leader-ahmad-al-sharaa

  11. Trump meets with Syria's insurgent-turned-leader in Saudi Arabia | Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.post-gazette.com/news/world/2025/05/14/trump-syria-leader-sharaa-sanctions-saudi/stories/202505140045

  12. Trump's wise, bold Syria reset - Responsible Statecraft, accessed May 14, 2025, https://responsiblestatecraft.org/trump-syria/

  13. Trump tells Gulf leaders Iran must cease support of proxy groups as part of any nuclear deal - AP News, accessed May 14, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-middle-east-syria-qatar-saudi-arabia-8bd63b3f9fc1856532a00adf1795e38f

  14. Israel 'normalisation' takes back seat as Trump announces Saudi deals - Al Jazeera, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/5/13/israel-normalisation-takes-backseat-as-trump-announces-saudi-deals

  15. Mideast experts weigh in on Trump's economic and defense deals in the region | PBS News, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/mideast-experts-weigh-in-on-trumps-economic-and-defense-deals-in-the-region

  16. Department Press Briefing - May 13, 2025, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.state.gov/briefings/department-press-briefing-may-13-2025/

  17. Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Secures Historic $600 Billion Investment Commitment in Saudi Arabia - The White House, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/05/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-secures-historic-600-billion-investment-commitment-in-saudi-arabia/

  18. Trump's visit to Saudi Arabia 'reflects depth of strategic partnership between US and Kingdom,' says foreign minister | Arab News, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.arabnews.com/node/2600670/saudi-arabia

  19. Trump's trip to Saudi Arabia raises the prospect of US nuclear cooperation with the kingdom - AP News, accessed May 14, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/civilian-nuclear-program-saudi-arabia-trump-iran-be8697a1890d0158cef57babb47e7583

  20. Trump visits Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE: What to know - Al Jazeera, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/5/12/trump-visits-saudi-arabia-qatar-uae-what-to-know

  21. Trump lands in Doha to boost trade, investment ties with Qatar - The New Arab, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.newarab.com/news/trump-lands-doha-boost-trade-investment-ties-qatar

  22. Trump's Middle East visit comes as his family deepens its business, crypto ties in the region - AP News, accessed May 14, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/trump-business-interests-family-middle-east-cryptocurrency-cbb7d2354304ce0308800819944cf3f8

  23. The Interplay of the United States and the Muslim World in the Israel-Palestine Conflict: A Complex Web of Interests and Tension, accessed May 14, 2025, https://ojs.ahss.org.pk/journal/article/download/676/717/1211

  24. Will Trump Greenlight Netanyahu's Endgame in Gaza? - REBEL News Ireland, accessed May 14, 2025, https://rebelnews.ie/2025/05/13/will-trump-greenlight-netanyahus-endgame-in-gaza/

  25. Trump and Netanyahu: Has the dispute reached the point of no return? - جريدة القدس, accessed May 14, 2025, https://alquds.com/en/posts/160500

  26. Trump's Gulf tour doesn't bode well for Israel - Politico.eu, accessed May 14, 2025, https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-gulf-states-tour-israel-benjamin-netanyahu/

What is the Emoluments Clause? And how might it apply to Qatar giving Trump a plane? - AP News, accessed May 14, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/emoluments-clause-trump-jet-qatar-56f995acb57eb741b0214aba5e7e8220

 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page